JOURNAL ARTICLE

Intima-media thickness and carotid resistive index: progression over 6 years and predictive value for cardiovascular events

H Uthoff, D Staub, A Meyerhans, M Hochuli, B Bundi, H P Schmid, B Frauchiger
Ultraschall in der Medizin 2008, 29 (6): 604-10
18528807

PURPOSE: Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery and the resistive index (RI) of the internal carotid artery correlate with the degree of atherosclerosis and are predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Limited or no data are available about long-term predictive values and the progression of the two markers themselves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 145 patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor or clinically manifest atherosclerosis were included. At enrollment and after 36 and 74 months, duplex sonographic measurements of IMT CCA and RI ICA were performed. During follow-up, the occurrence of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) was assessed.

RESULTS: At baseline, IMT was 0.79 +/- 0.16 mm and RI 0.66 +/- 0.08. Log-rank analysis showed a continuous increase in the risk of a cardiovascular event with an increasing range of IMT (p = 0.011) and RI (p = 0.006). IMT progression in patients with low versus high atherosclerotic burden (as defined by SMART score < or =7 points and > 7 points) differs significantly (32 +/- 83 microm versus 95 +/- 125 microm; p < 0.002). IMT progression was even more pronounced in patients suffering a cardiovascular event (141 +/- 105 microm versus 54 +/- 111 microm; p < 0.001). No significant RI ICA progression could be detected during follow-up in any group (patients with low vs. high atherosclerotic burden 0.00 +/- 0.06 versus 0.00 +/- 0.04; p = n. s.; patients with vs. without cardiovascular event 0.00 +/- 0.05 versus 0.01 +/- 0.03; p = n. s.).

CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the predictive value for cardiovascular events of RI and IMT in long-term follow-up. In contrast to RI, IMT increases over six years, above all in patients suffering a cardiovascular event. The results suggest that IMT is suitable for cardiovascular risk prediction as well as for progression measurements, while RI cannot be recommended for progression measurements. The effect of drug therapy on RI needs further clarification.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
18528807
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"