Clinical skills and self-efficacy after a curriculum on care for the underserved.

BACKGROUND: Despite calls for medical school curricula that address care for the underserved, published evaluations of such curricula are few and often do not assess clinical skills. This study assesses the changes in self-efficacy and clinical skills resulting from faculty-led or web-based curricula on care for the underserved.

METHODS: Third-year students on 6-week 2003-2004 pediatric clerkships were block-randomized to a curriculum on caring for the underserved in one of three formats: established (readings only), faculty-led, or web-based. Primary outcomes were pre- and post-curriculum changes in self-efficacy and clinical skills. ANCOVA was used to test differences among curriculum groups, adjusting for prior experiences with the underserved. Analyses were performed in 2007.

RESULTS: A total of 138 students participated, with 121 (88%) completing both pre- and post-tests. Compared to the established-curriculum students, both faculty-led and web-based students improved their self-efficacy in establishing achievable goals with underserved families, while web-based students improved their self-efficacy around knowledge of community resources. Significantly more new skills were performed by both faculty-led (mean [SD]=3.3[1.8]) and web-based curriculum students (2.9[1.5]), compared to established-curriculum students (1.5[1.4]). Compared to established-curriculum students, more faculty-led and web-based students also reported new skills in locating resources to meet the needs of underserved patients and in following up on referrals to ensure that families accessed needed care.

CONCLUSIONS: Web-based and faculty-led curricula improve medical student self-efficacy and clinical skills. Results from specific self-efficacy and skill items facilitate targeted curricular improvement.