Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Enteral feeding of a chemically defined diet preserves pulmonary immunity but not intestinal immunity: the role of lymphotoxin beta receptor.

BACKGROUND: Compared with chow or a complex enteral diet (CED), IV administration of a parenteral nutrition solution (IV-PN) impairs intestinal and respiratory mucosal immunity, resulting in cellular and immunoglobulin A (IgA) defects in the intestine and impaired respiratory antiviral and antibacterial defenses. PN given intragastrically (IG-PN) impairs intestinal immunity similar to IV-PN but preserves antiviral defences and partially preserves antibacterial defenses. Lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTbetaR) is a molecule essential for development and organization of lymphoid tissue. It controls many molecules important in mucosal immune integrity. This study examines effects of route (IV or enteral) and type (PN, CED, or chow) on murine intestine and lung LTbetaR expression.

METHODS: Forty-three mice randomly received IV-PN (n = 12), IG-PN (n = 11), IV saline + chow (chow; n = 11), or a CED (n = 9). After 5 days of feeding, intestinal and lung samples were obtained and processed for levels of LTbetaR by Western blot.

RESULTS: IV-PN significantly reduced intestinal and lung LTbetaR compared with CED and chow. IG-PN reduced LTbetaR levels only in the intestine but preserved lung levels.

CONCLUSIONS: Route and type of nutrition differentially influence molecular events in the intestinal and respiratory mucosal immune systems. Enteral feeding with any diet (complex or chemically defined) maintains lung LTbetaR expression, whereas intestinal LTbetaR levels are maintained only with CEDs (chow and CED). We hypothesize that LTbetaR is responsible for the observed preservation of respiratory tract immunity with administration of a noncomplex, chemically defined enteral diet, whereas intestinal immunity is compromised with this diet.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app