Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The cardiopulmonary exercise test is safe and reliable in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.

AIM: To assess safety and feasibility of cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) in elderly patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 395 cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPXs) performed in 227 clinically stable patients with CHF [mean age 76 years, males 70%, mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2.2 +/- 0.5] and impaired left ventricular function (mean ejection fraction 43 +/- 12%). Ninety-eight out of 395 CPXs (25%) were performed in patients older than 80 years. A standard bicycle exercise ramp protocol was used, with increments of 10 W/min. An expiratory exchange ratio (RER) >or= 1.05 at the peak of CPX was considered as the index of maximal exercise. Average workload was 65 +/- 23 W. No adverse reactions were observed, although one test was stopped for non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. The main reasons for stopping were exhaustion (50%), dyspnoea (30%), maximal predicted heart rate (17%), orthopaedic problems (2.5%) and significant ST segment depression (0.5%). In the overall cohort, 80% of patients achieved an RER >or= 1.05 and, in 56% of them, the RER was >or= 1.15. The anaerobic threshold (AT) was detectable in 80% of CPXs, and mean oxygen consumption (VO2) at AT was 9 +/- 6 ml/kg per min, whereas mean peak VO2 was 11 +/- 3 ml/kg per min. In the cohort of patients aged > 80 years, 71% reached an RER >or= 1.05 and 47% reached an RER >or= 1.15. In these older patients, AT was detectable in 68% of CPXs performed, and the mean peak VO2 was 10 +/- 3 ml/kg per min.

CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with CHF, the CPX is safe, feasible and able to provide basic information for individual risk assessment. These findings potentially extend the indications of CPX, which is currently applied to selected middle-aged patients with CHF, to the elderly population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app