Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Emotional distress among first-time patients attending outpatient mental health clinics in Israel: an Arab-Jewish comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused specifically on the role of ethnicity in emotional distress and symptoms among first-time psychiatric outpatients.

METHODS: 251 first-time patients, aged 18-72 years, attending three outpatient mental health clinics in Israel, were surveyed. Three methods of case detection were used: a GHQ-12 score (equal or >3), self-reported symptoms (using a checklist) and a psychiatrist's provisional ICD-10 diagnosis. In addition, self-efficacy and perceived social support were measured using standardized self-report questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared the two ethnic groups: Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews.

RESULTS: Compared to Jewish patients, Israeli Arab patients had a higher "distress caseness" rate based on GHQ-12 score (70.8% versus 41.2%) and a higher rate of psychiatrist-detected ICD-10 stress-related disorders (46.7% versus 23.3%), but a lower rate of self-reported emotional distress (36% versus 54.3%) and symptoms of mood disturbances (38.7% versus 64.7%). The Israeli Arabs also had lower mean scores on measures of self-efficacy (2.0 versus 2.4) and perceived social support from friends (12.2 versus 17.6) and significant others (16.7 versus 20.0). In a parsimonious regression model, the best predictors of emotional distress had low self-efficacy and social support from significant others, and, being Arab, these variables accounted for 27.1%, 7.2% and 8.8%, respectively, of the total variance in GHQ distress scores.

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the detection of emotional distress and symptoms varies markedly by patients' ethnic background. These variations can be predicted by a lower sense of self-efficacy and social support among Israeli Arabs as compared to Israeli Jews.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app