Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Mechanical ventilation in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Seminars in Dialysis 2006 November
The occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), is now common in intensive care units throughout the world. The diagnosis of ARDS is based on a definition that includes bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiographs, impaired oxygenation, and the absence of clinical evidence of elevated left atrial pressure. ARDS is the clinical result of a group of diverse processes, which range from physical or chemical injury, to extensive activation of innate inflammatory response. All these processes damage the integrity of the alveolar-capillary barrier causing increased alveolar-capillary permeability and an influx of protein-rich fluid into the alveolar space. This alveolar flooding results in hypoxemia, inactivated surfactant, intrapulmonary shunt, and impaired alveolar ventilation. The treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome is largely supportive in nature, keeping patients alive while allowing their lungs to heal, and minimizing further pulmonary insult. In 1994 the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) established the ARDS Network for the conduct of clinical trials. This is a network, supported by the National Institutes of Health, that provided the infrastructure for well-designed, multicenter, randomized trials of therapies for ARDS. The first study from this group in 2001 produced landmark data demonstrating mortality improvements in ARDS with particular mechanical ventilation strategies. Specifically, low tidal volume mechanical ventilation was demonstrated to reduce mortality by 22%. Other strategies such as high positive end expiratory pressure and prone positioning have not been shown to reduce mortality. Clinicians who are involved in the care of patients with ARDS should have a basic understanding of mechanical ventilation and the evidence guiding the mechanical ventilation strategies of these patients. Until further evidence is published, providers should adopt the use of a volume and pressure limited approach to mechanical ventilation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app