We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Intramyocardial injection of vascular endothelial growth factor-A165 plasmid followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to induce angiogenesis in patients with severe chronic ischaemic heart disease.
European Heart Journal 2006 August
AIMS: To assess the safety and effects of combined treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor-A(165) plasmid (VEGF-A(165)) and granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization of bone marrow stem cells in patients with severe chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients with severe chronic IHD were treated with intramyocardial injections of VEGF-A(165) plasmid followed 1 week later by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day for 6 days). Two control groups included (i) sixteen patients treated with intramyocardial injections of VEGF-A(165) plasmid and (ii) sixteen patients treated with intramyocardial injections of placebo. In the G-CSF group, circulating CD34+ stem cells increased almost 10-fold compared with the control groups (P<0.0001). After 3 months, there was no improvement in myocardial perfusion at single photon emission computerized tomography in the VEGF-A(165) and G-CSF treated group, and clinical symptoms were unchanged. There were no side effects to the gene and G-CSF therapy.
CONCLUSION: Intramyocardial VEGF-A(165) gene transfer followed by bone marrow stem cell mobilization with G-CSF seemed safe. However, a significant increase in circulating stem cells did not lead to improved myocardial perfusion or clinical effects suggesting a neutral effect of the treatment. To improve homing of stem cells, higher doses of VEGF-A(165) and/or use of SDF-1 transfer might be considered.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen patients with severe chronic IHD were treated with intramyocardial injections of VEGF-A(165) plasmid followed 1 week later by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day for 6 days). Two control groups included (i) sixteen patients treated with intramyocardial injections of VEGF-A(165) plasmid and (ii) sixteen patients treated with intramyocardial injections of placebo. In the G-CSF group, circulating CD34+ stem cells increased almost 10-fold compared with the control groups (P<0.0001). After 3 months, there was no improvement in myocardial perfusion at single photon emission computerized tomography in the VEGF-A(165) and G-CSF treated group, and clinical symptoms were unchanged. There were no side effects to the gene and G-CSF therapy.
CONCLUSION: Intramyocardial VEGF-A(165) gene transfer followed by bone marrow stem cell mobilization with G-CSF seemed safe. However, a significant increase in circulating stem cells did not lead to improved myocardial perfusion or clinical effects suggesting a neutral effect of the treatment. To improve homing of stem cells, higher doses of VEGF-A(165) and/or use of SDF-1 transfer might be considered.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app