We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Single dose pharmacokinetics of pleconaril in neonates. Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit Network.
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2000 September
BACKGROUND: Pleconaril is an orally active, broad spectrum antipicornaviral agent with activity against nonpolio enteroviruses. Pleconaril phamacokinetics was evaluated in 16 neonates (16.4 +/- 8.7 days postnatal age) with suspected enteroviral infection.
METHODS: Pleconaril (5 or 7.5 mg/kg) was administered orally to study subjects and plasma pleconaril concentrations quantified from serial blood samples obtained during 24 h after a single oral dose by gas chromatography with electrochemical detection. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were determined by noncompartmental methods and compared between doses and with similar data obtained from a previous study of pleconaril disposition in children (n = 18, 2 to 12 years).
RESULTS: Pleconaril was well-tolerated in all neonates without discernible adverse events. Comparison between the 5.0- and 7.5-mg/kg doses revealed no significant differences in peak plasma concentration (Cmax 686.7 vs. 617.1 ng/ml), elimination half-life (t 1/2; 4.6 vs. 6.6 h), area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC; 5162.6 vs. 5523.9 ng/ml/h), apparent steady state volume of distribution (V(dss)/F; 9.3 vs. 17.1 liters/ kg) and apparent oral clearance (Cl/F; 1.3 vs. 1.7 liters/h/kg). In addition, no correlation was observed between postconceptional age and AUC, V(dss)/F, t 1/2 or Cl/F for pleconaril. Comparison of pleconaril pharmacokinetics between neonates and children suggested a significant difference in V(dss)/F (9.3 vs. 4.7 liters/kg), dose-normalized Cmax, (686.7 vs. 1272.5 ng(ml) and AUC (5125.6 vs. 8131.2 ng/ml/h). In contrast, the mean elimination t 1/2 between neonates and children was not appreciably different.
CONCLUSIONS: The apparent age-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics of pleconaril may in part be related to increased bioavailability of the drug in older children and adults than in neonates. Our data appear to support the use of a 5.0-mg/kg dose given every 8 to 12 h in future studies of pleconaril in neonatal patients with enteroviral infection.
METHODS: Pleconaril (5 or 7.5 mg/kg) was administered orally to study subjects and plasma pleconaril concentrations quantified from serial blood samples obtained during 24 h after a single oral dose by gas chromatography with electrochemical detection. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were determined by noncompartmental methods and compared between doses and with similar data obtained from a previous study of pleconaril disposition in children (n = 18, 2 to 12 years).
RESULTS: Pleconaril was well-tolerated in all neonates without discernible adverse events. Comparison between the 5.0- and 7.5-mg/kg doses revealed no significant differences in peak plasma concentration (Cmax 686.7 vs. 617.1 ng/ml), elimination half-life (t 1/2; 4.6 vs. 6.6 h), area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC; 5162.6 vs. 5523.9 ng/ml/h), apparent steady state volume of distribution (V(dss)/F; 9.3 vs. 17.1 liters/ kg) and apparent oral clearance (Cl/F; 1.3 vs. 1.7 liters/h/kg). In addition, no correlation was observed between postconceptional age and AUC, V(dss)/F, t 1/2 or Cl/F for pleconaril. Comparison of pleconaril pharmacokinetics between neonates and children suggested a significant difference in V(dss)/F (9.3 vs. 4.7 liters/kg), dose-normalized Cmax, (686.7 vs. 1272.5 ng(ml) and AUC (5125.6 vs. 8131.2 ng/ml/h). In contrast, the mean elimination t 1/2 between neonates and children was not appreciably different.
CONCLUSIONS: The apparent age-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics of pleconaril may in part be related to increased bioavailability of the drug in older children and adults than in neonates. Our data appear to support the use of a 5.0-mg/kg dose given every 8 to 12 h in future studies of pleconaril in neonatal patients with enteroviral infection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app