Multicentric experience of antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of thoracic aortic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this multicentre retrospective cohort study is to evaluate technical success, early and late outcomes of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with grafts deployed upside-down through antegrade access, to treat thoracic aortic diseases.

METHODS: Antegrade TEVAR performed between January 2010 and December 2021 have been collected and analyzed. Both elective and urgent procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were endografts deployed into previous or concomitant surgical or endovascular repairs.

RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled; 13 males (94%) with mean age of 71 years (IQR 62; 78). Five patients underwent urgent procedures (2 ruptured aortas and 3 symptomatic patients). Indication to treatment were 8 (57%) aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms, 3 (21%) dissections and 3 (21%) penetrating aortic ulcers. Technical success was achieved in all procedures. Early mortality occurred in 4 (28%) cases, all urgent procedures. Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 1; 44). Late death occurred in 2 (20%) patients, both operated in elective setting. The first died at 19 months due to aortic-related reintervention, the second died at 34 months for a not aortic-related cause. Two patients (14%) underwent aortic-related reintervention for late type I endoleak. Survival rate in elective procedures was 100%, 84% and 67% at 12, 24 and 36 months respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 92%, 56% and 56% at 12, 24 and 36 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade TEVAR can seldomly be considered an alternative when traditional retrograde approach is not feasible. Despite good technical success and low access-site complications, this study demonstrates high rates of late type I endoleak and aortic-related reinterventions.