We have located links that may give you full text access.
Transperineal Ultrasound Evaluation of Bladder Parameters in Patients with Apical Prolapse Undergoing Lateral Suspension or Sacropexy.
INTRODUCTION: and hypothesis.We evaluated different bladder parameters using Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) in patients with apical pelvic organ prolapse undergoing lateral suspension or sacropexy.
METHODS: We included 73 cases with 37 cases in lateral suspension (LS) group and 36 cases in sacropexy group. We enrolled cases with apical prolapse stage 2 or higher according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Evaluation done of all cases using TPUS preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up visits.
RESULTS: In LS group we found significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height (Dy distance) at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 in both) and in β angle at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 in both). There was significant improvement in PVR ( P value < 0.001). In sacropexy group we found no significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height at Valsalva ( P value 0.07) or in β angle at Valsalva ( P value 0.097). There was significant improvement in PVR ( P value 0.006). In between the 2 groups, there was better improvement in LS group than sacropexy group in bladder neck height at rest ( P value 0.001) and in β angle both at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 & 0.002 respectively). There was no significant difference in PVR, bladder wall thickness or bladder neck funnelling.
CONCLUSION: LS and sacropexy showed good postoperative improvement in some bladder parameters using TPUS with better improvement in bladder neck height in LS.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial ID: NCT03772691.
METHODS: We included 73 cases with 37 cases in lateral suspension (LS) group and 36 cases in sacropexy group. We enrolled cases with apical prolapse stage 2 or higher according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Evaluation done of all cases using TPUS preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up visits.
RESULTS: In LS group we found significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height (Dy distance) at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 in both) and in β angle at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 in both). There was significant improvement in PVR ( P value < 0.001). In sacropexy group we found no significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height at Valsalva ( P value 0.07) or in β angle at Valsalva ( P value 0.097). There was significant improvement in PVR ( P value 0.006). In between the 2 groups, there was better improvement in LS group than sacropexy group in bladder neck height at rest ( P value 0.001) and in β angle both at Valsalva and rest ( P value < 0.001 & 0.002 respectively). There was no significant difference in PVR, bladder wall thickness or bladder neck funnelling.
CONCLUSION: LS and sacropexy showed good postoperative improvement in some bladder parameters using TPUS with better improvement in bladder neck height in LS.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial ID: NCT03772691.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app