We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pain symptoms are associated with two-point discrimination threshold in patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Clinical Oral Investigations 2024 April 26
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the associations of orofacial two-point discrimination (2-PD) test result with pain symptoms and psychological factors in patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs).
METHODS: 193 patients with TMDs were included in this study. Patients' demographics, pain intensity, and psychological status were recorded. The 2-PDs in the bilateral temporal, zygomatic, mandibular, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions of the patients were measured. Statistical analyses were conducted to observe the associations between variables.
RESULTS: For Pain-related TMDs (PT) patients, Monthly Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-M) and Current Analogue Scale (VAS-C) were correlated with TMJ, zygomatic and temporal 2-PDs. Patients with PT tended to have higher TMJ 2-PDs[Right: β = 1.827 mm, 95%CI(0.107, 3.548), P = 0.038], zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: β = 1.696 mm, 95%CI(0.344, 3.048), P = 0.014], temporal 2-PDs[Left: β = 2.138 mm, 95%CI(0.127, 4.149), P = 0.037; Right: β = 1.893 mm, 95%CI(0.011, 3.775), P = 0.049]. Associations were also observed between VAS-C and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.780, 95%CI(0.190, 1.370), P = 0.01; Right: β = 0.885, 95%CI(0.406, 1.364), P = 0.001], Zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: β = 0.555, 95%CI(0.172, 0.938), P = 0.005]; VAS-M and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.812, 95%CI(0.313, 1.311), P = 0.002; Right: β = 0.567, 95%CI(0.152, 0.983), P = 0.008], zygomatic 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.405, 95%CI(0.075, 0.735), P = 0.016; Right: β = 0.545, 95%CI(0.221, 0.870), P = 0.001], and temporal 2-PDs [Left: β = 0.741, 95%CI(0.258, 1.224), P = 0.003; Right: β = 0.519, 95%CI(0.063, 0.975), P = 0.026].
CONCLUSION: TMJ, zygomatic, and temporal 2-PDs were significantly associated with PT and pain intensity. Age, gender and psychological factors were not associated with orofacial 2-PDs. PT patients exhibited weaker tactile acuity compared to Non-PT patients. Further discussion on the underlying mechanism is needed.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orofacial tactile acuity of TMDs patients was associated with their pain symptoms, which researchers should take account into when performing 2-PD tests for TMDs patients. The 2-PD test can be considered as a potential tool along with the current procedures for the differentiations of PT and Non-PT.
METHODS: 193 patients with TMDs were included in this study. Patients' demographics, pain intensity, and psychological status were recorded. The 2-PDs in the bilateral temporal, zygomatic, mandibular, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions of the patients were measured. Statistical analyses were conducted to observe the associations between variables.
RESULTS: For Pain-related TMDs (PT) patients, Monthly Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-M) and Current Analogue Scale (VAS-C) were correlated with TMJ, zygomatic and temporal 2-PDs. Patients with PT tended to have higher TMJ 2-PDs[Right: β = 1.827 mm, 95%CI(0.107, 3.548), P = 0.038], zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: β = 1.696 mm, 95%CI(0.344, 3.048), P = 0.014], temporal 2-PDs[Left: β = 2.138 mm, 95%CI(0.127, 4.149), P = 0.037; Right: β = 1.893 mm, 95%CI(0.011, 3.775), P = 0.049]. Associations were also observed between VAS-C and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.780, 95%CI(0.190, 1.370), P = 0.01; Right: β = 0.885, 95%CI(0.406, 1.364), P = 0.001], Zygomatic 2-PDs[Right: β = 0.555, 95%CI(0.172, 0.938), P = 0.005]; VAS-M and TMJ 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.812, 95%CI(0.313, 1.311), P = 0.002; Right: β = 0.567, 95%CI(0.152, 0.983), P = 0.008], zygomatic 2-PDs[Left: β = 0.405, 95%CI(0.075, 0.735), P = 0.016; Right: β = 0.545, 95%CI(0.221, 0.870), P = 0.001], and temporal 2-PDs [Left: β = 0.741, 95%CI(0.258, 1.224), P = 0.003; Right: β = 0.519, 95%CI(0.063, 0.975), P = 0.026].
CONCLUSION: TMJ, zygomatic, and temporal 2-PDs were significantly associated with PT and pain intensity. Age, gender and psychological factors were not associated with orofacial 2-PDs. PT patients exhibited weaker tactile acuity compared to Non-PT patients. Further discussion on the underlying mechanism is needed.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orofacial tactile acuity of TMDs patients was associated with their pain symptoms, which researchers should take account into when performing 2-PD tests for TMDs patients. The 2-PD test can be considered as a potential tool along with the current procedures for the differentiations of PT and Non-PT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app