Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Co-surgeon versus single-surgeon outcomes in free tissue breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous breast reconstruction offers superior long-term patient reported outcomes compared to implant-based reconstruction. Universal adoption of free tissue transfer has been hindered by procedural complexity and long operative time with microsurgery. In many specialties, co-surgeon approaches are reported to decrease operative time while improving surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes the available literature to evaluate the potential benefit of a co-surgeon approach in autologous free tissue breast reconstruction versus single-surgeon.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using Pubmed,Embase and MEDLINE from inception to December 2022. Published reports comparing co-surgeon (CS) to single-surgeon (SS) approaches in uni- and bilateral autologous breast reconstruction were identified. Primary outcomes included operative time, post-operative outcomes, processes of care, and financial impact. Risk of bias was assessed and outcomes were characterized with effect sizes.

RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies reporting on 9425 patients were included. Compared with SS, CS approach was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (SMD,-0.65,95% CI -1.01 to -0.29,p<0.001), with the largest effect size in bilateral reconstructions(SMD,-1.02,95% CI -1.37 to -0.67,p<0.00001). CS was also associated with a significant decrease in length of hospitalization(SMD,-0.39,95% CI -0.71 to -0.07,p=0.02). Odds of flap failure or surgical complications including surgical site infection, hematoma, fat necrosis and re-exploration were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION: CS free tissue breast reconstruction significantly shortens operative time and length of hospitalization compared to SS approaches without compromising post-operative outcomes. Further research should model processes and financial viability of its adoption in a variety of healthcare models.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app