Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Impact of procedural techniques on mid-term patency of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent placed in the femoropopliteal artery.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of optimal procedural techniques on the mid-term patency of fluoropolymer-based drug-eluting stent (FP-DES) in femoropopliteal artery.

METHODS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 200 femoropopliteal lesions (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, 59%; chronic total occlusion, 41%) in 173 patients (male, 66%; diabetes mellitus, 62%; hemodialysis, 40%) with lower extremity arterial disease undergoing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided endovascular therapy with FP-DES between January 2016 and July 2021. The primary outcome measure was restenosis, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of >2.4 based on the DUS findings. The association between procedural techniques and the incidence of restenosis was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence of restenosis was 19.5±3.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed that non-compliance with procedural techniques, such as plaque burden at the stent edge <50%, MSA >12 mm2 , and stent placement within the P1 segment, were independently associated with an increased risk of restenosis (hazard ratios [HRs], 3.22, 4.71, and 4.67; p=0.004, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). The 2-year restenosis risk was 8.4±3.4% for those in compliance with all 3-technical criteria, while the risk for those in compliance with 2-technical criteria or 0 or 1 technical criteria was 25.0±6.2% and 48.6±10.4%, respectively. The HR relative to 3-technical criteria compliance was 3.79 (p=0.007) and 11.85 (p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION: Non-compliance with procedural techniques, including plaque burden at stent edge <50%, MSA >12 mm2 , and stent placement within the P1 segment, was significantly associated with an increased risk of 2-year restenosis after FP-DES implantation in femoropopliteal artery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app