We have located links that may give you full text access.
A modified oblique lumbar interbody fusion: A better way to establish an exposure under direct microscopic vision.
Frontiers in Surgery 2023
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a modified oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OILF) technique for L1-L5.
METHODS: The modified technique splits anterior portion of psoas belly to access the oblique corridor (OC) anteroinferior to psoas, minimizing psoas manipulation and retraction and avoiding nerve injury while offering excellent microscopic visualization. Psoas weakness and neurovascular complication rates in patients treated with traditional OLIF (T-OLIF) or anteroinferior psoas OLIF (AP-OLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 162 cases treated with T-OLIF ( n = 73) and AP-OLIF ( n = 89) for degenerative lumbar disease were included. The mean operative time and blood loss were less with AP-OLIF ( P < 0.01). Approach related complications were 14 (19.1%) with T-OLIF and 4 (4.5%) with AP-OLIF. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved in both T-OIF and AP-OIF groups ( P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The modified OLIF technique (AP-OLIF) is characterized by an easy exposure of the lumbar spine under direct microscopic vision, resulting in less psoas weakness and neurovascular injury.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a modified oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OILF) technique for L1-L5.
METHODS: The modified technique splits anterior portion of psoas belly to access the oblique corridor (OC) anteroinferior to psoas, minimizing psoas manipulation and retraction and avoiding nerve injury while offering excellent microscopic visualization. Psoas weakness and neurovascular complication rates in patients treated with traditional OLIF (T-OLIF) or anteroinferior psoas OLIF (AP-OLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 162 cases treated with T-OLIF ( n = 73) and AP-OLIF ( n = 89) for degenerative lumbar disease were included. The mean operative time and blood loss were less with AP-OLIF ( P < 0.01). Approach related complications were 14 (19.1%) with T-OLIF and 4 (4.5%) with AP-OLIF. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved in both T-OIF and AP-OIF groups ( P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The modified OLIF technique (AP-OLIF) is characterized by an easy exposure of the lumbar spine under direct microscopic vision, resulting in less psoas weakness and neurovascular injury.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app