We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Versus Placebo for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Surgical Innovation 2023 Februrary 17
BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD) has been extensively studies in the past decade. Its efficacy and safety had been preliminarily confirmed in some phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials. This meta-analysis is performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MSCs-based therapy for pfCD.
METHODS: Electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase) were searched for studies that reported the efficacy and safety of MSCs. And RevMan were used to assess the efficacy and safety.
RESULTS: After screening, 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. RevMan 5.4 for meta-analysis showed that: [Efficacy] Patients had definite remission after MSCs treatment, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.06 ( P < .0001, 95%CI 1.46, 2.89) vs controls. [Safety] The incidence of the most frequently reported TEAEs (treatment-emergent adverse events, TEAEs), perianal abscess and proctalgia, did not significantly increase due to the use of MSCs, with an OR of 1.07 in perianal abscess ( P = .87, 95%CI 0.67, 1.72) vs controls, and an OR of 1.10 in proctalgia ( P = .47, 95%CI 0.63, 1.92) vs controls.
CONCLUSIONS: MSCs seem to be an effective and safe therapy for pfCD. MSCs based therapy has the potential to be used in combination with traditional therapies.
METHODS: Electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase) were searched for studies that reported the efficacy and safety of MSCs. And RevMan were used to assess the efficacy and safety.
RESULTS: After screening, 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis. RevMan 5.4 for meta-analysis showed that: [Efficacy] Patients had definite remission after MSCs treatment, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.06 ( P < .0001, 95%CI 1.46, 2.89) vs controls. [Safety] The incidence of the most frequently reported TEAEs (treatment-emergent adverse events, TEAEs), perianal abscess and proctalgia, did not significantly increase due to the use of MSCs, with an OR of 1.07 in perianal abscess ( P = .87, 95%CI 0.67, 1.72) vs controls, and an OR of 1.10 in proctalgia ( P = .47, 95%CI 0.63, 1.92) vs controls.
CONCLUSIONS: MSCs seem to be an effective and safe therapy for pfCD. MSCs based therapy has the potential to be used in combination with traditional therapies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app