We have located links that may give you full text access.
MRI-determined anterolateral capsule injury did not affect the pivot-shift in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees.
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2019 Februrary 5
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the results of pivot-shift test between knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with and without anterolateral capsule (ALC) injury detected on MRI. ALC injury was hypothesized to worsen rotatory knee laxity.
METHODS: 82 patients with unilateral ACL injury were enrolled in this study. The pivot-shift test was performed under anesthesia before ACL reconstruction. Two evaluations were conducted simultaneously: IKDC clinical grading and the quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system that determined tibial acceleration (m/s2 ). Two examiners identified the ALC injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and stratified patients into two groups: ALC-injured (ALC+) and ALC-intact (ALC-). ALC injury was diagnosed if the signal intensity on coronal T2-weighted sequences is increased. After confirming the reliability of the MRI, the difference in the pivot-shift between two groups was assessed.
RESULTS: Because of the poor agreement between examiners with respect to the ALC evaluations (κ coefficient of 0.25 and 58.5% concordance), the result from each examiner was analyzed separately. Examiner 1 found ALC injury in 42/82 knees (51%). The two groups had similar clinical grading (glide/clunk/gross: ALC+ group 21/18/3cases vs. ALC- group 21/16/3cases) (n.s.). Tibial acceleration during pivot-shift was also similar in the ALC+ (1.4 ± 1.2 m/s2 ) and ALC- (1.7 ± 1.3 m/s2 ) groups (n.s.). Examiner 2 found ALC injury in 28/82 knees (34%). Differences in clinical grading were not observed (glide/clunk/gross: ALC+ group 16/9/3 vs. ALC- group 26/25/3) (n.s.). However, the tibial acceleration in the ALC+ group (1.2 ± 0.8 m/s2 ) was significantly lower than that in the ALC- group (1.7 ± 1.3 m/s2 , p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Concomitant ALC injury in knees with ACL injury was not consistently detected on MRI and did not affect rotatory knee laxity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, level III.
METHODS: 82 patients with unilateral ACL injury were enrolled in this study. The pivot-shift test was performed under anesthesia before ACL reconstruction. Two evaluations were conducted simultaneously: IKDC clinical grading and the quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system that determined tibial acceleration (m/s2 ). Two examiners identified the ALC injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and stratified patients into two groups: ALC-injured (ALC+) and ALC-intact (ALC-). ALC injury was diagnosed if the signal intensity on coronal T2-weighted sequences is increased. After confirming the reliability of the MRI, the difference in the pivot-shift between two groups was assessed.
RESULTS: Because of the poor agreement between examiners with respect to the ALC evaluations (κ coefficient of 0.25 and 58.5% concordance), the result from each examiner was analyzed separately. Examiner 1 found ALC injury in 42/82 knees (51%). The two groups had similar clinical grading (glide/clunk/gross: ALC+ group 21/18/3cases vs. ALC- group 21/16/3cases) (n.s.). Tibial acceleration during pivot-shift was also similar in the ALC+ (1.4 ± 1.2 m/s2 ) and ALC- (1.7 ± 1.3 m/s2 ) groups (n.s.). Examiner 2 found ALC injury in 28/82 knees (34%). Differences in clinical grading were not observed (glide/clunk/gross: ALC+ group 16/9/3 vs. ALC- group 26/25/3) (n.s.). However, the tibial acceleration in the ALC+ group (1.2 ± 0.8 m/s2 ) was significantly lower than that in the ALC- group (1.7 ± 1.3 m/s2 , p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Concomitant ALC injury in knees with ACL injury was not consistently detected on MRI and did not affect rotatory knee laxity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, level III.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app