We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reconstruction of Microtias with Constricted Ear Features: A 22-Year Experience.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2018 March
BACKGROUND: The surgical correction of microtias with constricted ear features has remained a challenge because of the variable shape and large volume of the remnant cartilage and skin involved. To clarify how this remnant cartilage and skin should be treated, the authors have reviewed and analyzed cases operated on at their center.
METHODS: A total of 167 cases of microtia with constricted ear features, operated on from 1992 to 2014, were included in the study. They were reviewed through medical records and photographs, analysis of surgical methods, and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 141 cases (84 percent) were followed for 2 months to 13 years (average, 28 months). The average score given for the aesthetic outcomes, rated on a four-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent), was 3.1. For framework construction, the authors used remnant cartilage-saving methods (n = 37) or remnant cartilage-replacement methods (n = 104). The average scores for the aesthetic outcome for these methods were 2.56 (median, 3) and 3.36 (median, 4), respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For the coverage of new frameworks, various flap techniques were used.
CONCLUSION: To correct microtias with constricted ear features with consistent postoperative results, the deformed cartilage remnant should be completely replaced with a costal cartilage framework, and the remnant skin should be maximally saved.
METHODS: A total of 167 cases of microtia with constricted ear features, operated on from 1992 to 2014, were included in the study. They were reviewed through medical records and photographs, analysis of surgical methods, and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 141 cases (84 percent) were followed for 2 months to 13 years (average, 28 months). The average score given for the aesthetic outcomes, rated on a four-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent), was 3.1. For framework construction, the authors used remnant cartilage-saving methods (n = 37) or remnant cartilage-replacement methods (n = 104). The average scores for the aesthetic outcome for these methods were 2.56 (median, 3) and 3.36 (median, 4), respectively. The difference in these scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For the coverage of new frameworks, various flap techniques were used.
CONCLUSION: To correct microtias with constricted ear features with consistent postoperative results, the deformed cartilage remnant should be completely replaced with a costal cartilage framework, and the remnant skin should be maximally saved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app