We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reduction of misregistration on cerebral four-dimensional computed tomography angiography images using advanced patient motion correction reconstruction.
Japanese Journal of Radiology 2016 September
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether advanced patient motion correction (APMC) can reduce the misregistration of pixels between the different X-ray tube positions in four-dimensional CT angiography (4D-CTA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with intracranial aneurysms were included in this retrospective study. We compared the CTA images with APMC reconstruction and half-scan reconstruction with regard to the following 3 items: (1) bone misalignment area; (2) image noise; and (3) aneurysm volume change.
RESULTS: The bone misalignment area and image noise were significantly reduced in the APMC images, as compared to that in the half-scan reconstruction images (bone misalignment area: 33.0 ± 18.1 cm(3) vs 152.0 ± 72.2 cm(3), respectively; p < 0.001) (image noise at pons: 9.70 ± 2.58 vs 15.16 ± 5.02, respectively, p < 0.001). The aneurysm volume and volume variance were significantly smaller in the APMC reconstruction than those in the half-scan reconstruction (volume: 1107.2 ± 1813.8 mm(3) vs 1135.1 ± 1853.8 mm(3); p < 0.05; coefficient of variation: 0.0291 ± 0.014 vs 0.0463 ± 0.026, p < 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our results show that APMC reduces the reconstruction related misregistration between the cardiac phases compared to half-scan reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with intracranial aneurysms were included in this retrospective study. We compared the CTA images with APMC reconstruction and half-scan reconstruction with regard to the following 3 items: (1) bone misalignment area; (2) image noise; and (3) aneurysm volume change.
RESULTS: The bone misalignment area and image noise were significantly reduced in the APMC images, as compared to that in the half-scan reconstruction images (bone misalignment area: 33.0 ± 18.1 cm(3) vs 152.0 ± 72.2 cm(3), respectively; p < 0.001) (image noise at pons: 9.70 ± 2.58 vs 15.16 ± 5.02, respectively, p < 0.001). The aneurysm volume and volume variance were significantly smaller in the APMC reconstruction than those in the half-scan reconstruction (volume: 1107.2 ± 1813.8 mm(3) vs 1135.1 ± 1853.8 mm(3); p < 0.05; coefficient of variation: 0.0291 ± 0.014 vs 0.0463 ± 0.026, p < 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our results show that APMC reduces the reconstruction related misregistration between the cardiac phases compared to half-scan reconstruction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app