Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection in a Large Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Kidney Allograft Recipients--Preliminary Results of the Screening Phase of the BORTEJECT Trial.

There is limited data on the rate of late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in unselected transplant cohorts. Here, we investigated the prevalence and characteristics of ABMR in a large cohort of long-term kidney allograft recipients. Patients were screened in the context of a randomized controlled trial (BORTEJECT study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01873157) designed to investigate the impact of bortezomib on the course of late ABMR. The study (initiation in October 2013) includes a cross-sectional ABMR screening (key inclusion criterion: functioning graft at ≥ 180 days) to identify 44 recipients eligible for inclusion in the intervention trial. Patients were screened for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) applying solid phase technology and DSA+ recipients underwent protocol biopsies. Through November 2014, ABMR screening (after a median of 6.5 years post-transplantation) had been completed for 714 recipients. One hundred one patients (14%) had DSA above a threshold of 1,000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Forty-four of 78 DSA+ recipients (6% of the overall cohort) subjected to biopsy were diagnosed with C4d-positive (n = 17) or -negative (n = 27) ABMR and 40 consented to participate in the intervention trial. DSA+ABMR+ and DSA+ABMR- patients differed significantly with respect to the MFI of the highest level DSA (P < 0.001), whereby ABMR or C4d positivity were moderately predicted by MFI values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.75 and 0.84, respectively). In conclusion, the results of this cross-sectional analysis suggest a ≥ 6% prevalence of late ABMR. We demonstrate that the more frequent finding of circulating DSA may not necessarily associate with ABMR diagnosis, especially in patients with low antibody levels.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app