Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy: do nodule volume and cystic degeneration ratio affect specimen adequacy and cytological diagnosis time?

Acta Radiologica 2015 October
BACKGROUND: A fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules - the least invasive and most accurate method used to investigate malignant lesions - may yield non-diagnostic specimens even under ultrasonographic guidance.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of thyroid nodule volume and extent of cystic degeneration on both the non-diagnostic specimen ratio as well as cytopathologist's definitive cytological diagnosis time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single center study, FNAB was performed on 505 patients with single thyroid nodules greater than 10 mm. Nodule volume was calculated prior to FNAB and cystic degeneration ratio was recorded. All biopsies were performed by a single radiologist who also prepared specimen slides. Specimen adequacy and final diagnosis were made in the pathology laboratory by a single-blinded cytopathologist based on the Bethesda system. Definitive cytological diagnosis time was recorded upon reaching a definitive diagnosis.

RESULTS: The specimen adequacy ratio was 85.3%. The mean nodule volume of adequate specimens was larger than those of non-diagnostic samples (6.00 mL vs. 3.05 mL; P = 0.001). There was no correlation between nodule volume and cytopathologist's definitive cytological diagnosis time (r = 0.042). Biopsy of predominantly solid nodules yielded better specimen adequacy ratios compared to predominantly cystic nodules (87.8% vs. 75.3%; P = 0.028). Definitive cytological diagnosis times were longer in predominantly cystic nodules compared to predominantly solid nodules (376 s vs. 294 s; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION: Predominantly cystic nodules are likely to benefit from repeated nodular sampling until the specimen is declared adequate by an on-site cytopathologist. If a cytopathologist is not available, obtaining more specimens per nodule may achieve desired adequacy ratios.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app