We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparison of intense pulsed light with 1,927-nm fractionated thulium fiber laser for the rejuvenation of the chest.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2014 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Rejuvenation of the aging chest is important to prevent noticeable disparities between the treated skin of the face and that of the untreated chest.
OBJECTIVE: To compare a high-density thulium fiber laser (TFL)-based protocol for the rejuvenation of the aging chest with intense pulsed light (IPL).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective chart review comparing patients treated with IPL and those treated with TFL in combination with a quality-switched alexandrite laser and long pulsed dye laser. Blinded photographic assessment of overall improvement, rhytides, skin texture, dyspigmentation, and telangiectasia was performed. Patient satisfaction was assessed in a standardized follow-up survey. Cost and practicality were compared.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 45.8 days for IPL and 78.3 days for TFL, the two protocols had comparable clinical efficacy in achieving rejuvenation of the chest. Differences existed in terms of cost and practicality.
CONCLUSION: TFL can be used at high density and in simultaneous combination with other targeted laser modalities to achieve rejuvenation of the aging chest. IPL achieves similar clinical efficacy. The choice between treatment modalities depends on physician and patient preferences.
OBJECTIVE: To compare a high-density thulium fiber laser (TFL)-based protocol for the rejuvenation of the aging chest with intense pulsed light (IPL).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective chart review comparing patients treated with IPL and those treated with TFL in combination with a quality-switched alexandrite laser and long pulsed dye laser. Blinded photographic assessment of overall improvement, rhytides, skin texture, dyspigmentation, and telangiectasia was performed. Patient satisfaction was assessed in a standardized follow-up survey. Cost and practicality were compared.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 45.8 days for IPL and 78.3 days for TFL, the two protocols had comparable clinical efficacy in achieving rejuvenation of the chest. Differences existed in terms of cost and practicality.
CONCLUSION: TFL can be used at high density and in simultaneous combination with other targeted laser modalities to achieve rejuvenation of the aging chest. IPL achieves similar clinical efficacy. The choice between treatment modalities depends on physician and patient preferences.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app