Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus using haemoglobin A1c: a community-based historic cohort study.
European Journal of General Practice 2014 June
BACKGROUND: The ADA 2010 guidelines added HbA1c ≥ 6.5% as a criterion for diagnosing diabetes mellitus type 2.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the HbA1c test in predicting type 2 diabetes in a high risk population.
METHODS: A community-based historic cohort study was conducted including 10 201 patients, who had not been diagnosed with diabetes, and who underwent HbA1c test during the years 2002-2005. Data was retrieved on diabetes risk factors and the onset of diabetes (according to the ADA 2003 criteria), during a follow-up period of five-to-eight years.
RESULTS: Mean age was 58.25 ± 15.58 years; mean HbA1c level was 5.59 ± 0.55% and 76.8% had a BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (mean: 30.74 ± 8.30). In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, the risk of developing type 2 diabetes was 2.49 (95% CI: 1.29-3.71) for 5.5% ≤ HbA1c < 6% at baseline, 4.82 (95% CI: 2.83-8.20) for 6% ≤ HbA1c < 6.5% at baseline and 7.57 (95% CI: 4.43-12.93) for 6.5% ≤ HbA1c < 7% at baseline, compared to HbA1c < 4.5%. The risk of developing diabetes was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.25) for male gender, 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04-1.28) for cardiovascular diseases and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.80-2.35) for overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m(2)) at baseline. Neither age nor low socio-economic status was associated with increased risk of diabetes.
CONCLUSION: Levels of HbA1c ≥ 5.5% were associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes during a five-to-eight-year follow-up period. Findings support the use of HbA1c testing as a screening tool in populations at risk of developing diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the HbA1c test in predicting type 2 diabetes in a high risk population.
METHODS: A community-based historic cohort study was conducted including 10 201 patients, who had not been diagnosed with diabetes, and who underwent HbA1c test during the years 2002-2005. Data was retrieved on diabetes risk factors and the onset of diabetes (according to the ADA 2003 criteria), during a follow-up period of five-to-eight years.
RESULTS: Mean age was 58.25 ± 15.58 years; mean HbA1c level was 5.59 ± 0.55% and 76.8% had a BMI > 25 kg/m(2) (mean: 30.74 ± 8.30). In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, the risk of developing type 2 diabetes was 2.49 (95% CI: 1.29-3.71) for 5.5% ≤ HbA1c < 6% at baseline, 4.82 (95% CI: 2.83-8.20) for 6% ≤ HbA1c < 6.5% at baseline and 7.57 (95% CI: 4.43-12.93) for 6.5% ≤ HbA1c < 7% at baseline, compared to HbA1c < 4.5%. The risk of developing diabetes was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.25) for male gender, 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04-1.28) for cardiovascular diseases and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.80-2.35) for overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m(2)) at baseline. Neither age nor low socio-economic status was associated with increased risk of diabetes.
CONCLUSION: Levels of HbA1c ≥ 5.5% were associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes during a five-to-eight-year follow-up period. Findings support the use of HbA1c testing as a screening tool in populations at risk of developing diabetes.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app