The world post-STICH: is this a "Game Changer?" A non-invasive cardiologist's perspective-revascularization is the treatment of choice only in patients who fail medical therapy.

The optimal management for ischemic cardiomyopathy has been a clinical conundrum for years. Until the publication of the Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Cardiac Heart Failure (STICH) trial, recommendations have been primarily based upon expert opinion, retrospective literature, and clinical anecdotes. However, medical and device management have matured significantly in an era where surgical morbidity and mortality remain significant for coronary bypass grafting in the setting of severe left ventricular dysfunction. For the first time in years, there now exists a landmark prospective randomized clinical trial that addresses the role of coronary bypass surgery as an initial strategy for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Although many interpretations of STICH exist, the neutral results of STICH should reassure clinicians that a strategy of initiating and optimizing medical therapy and deferring surgical revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy in "STICH-like patients" is effective, safe, and tested.