COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY

Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry

Stephan Staubach, Jennifer Franke, Ulrich Gerckens, Gerhard Schuler, Ralf Zahn, Holger Eggebrecht, Rainer Hambrecht, Stefan Sack, Gert Richardt, Martin Horack, Jochen Senges, Daniel H Steinberg, Jakob Ledwoch, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Mirko Doss, Nina Wunderlich, Horst Sievert
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2013, 81 (2): 348-55
22566406

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging technology in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Whether the degree of aortic valve calcification impacts the outcome after TAVI has not been thoroughly evaluated.

METHODS: We analyzed data from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry, including 1,365 patients as of July 2010. Patients were divided into three groups, based on the degree of aortic valve calcification: mild (n = 67), moderate (n = 392), and severe (n = 906) valve calcification, determined by visual estimation by the operator.

RESULTS: Mean age was 81.7 ± 6.2 years; mean logistic EUROscore was 20.6 ± 13.7%. Patients with severe aortic valve calcification had a higher mean and peak-to-peak gradient before the intervention (P < 0.0001). Technical success was achieved in 97%, similar in each group. The Medtronic CoreValve was implanted in 80.8%, the Sapien Edwards prosthesis in the remaining cases. The duration of the procedure and fluoroscopy was higher in the group with severe calcification (P < 0.01 for procedure and P < 0.05 for fluoroscopy). During the periprocedural period there were no differences among the groups regarding in-hospital death, cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, thromboembolic events, aortic dissection, or severe vascular complications. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in postprocedural aortic mean gradient (7.0 mm Hg vs. 5.6 mm Hg vs. 6.3 mm Hg; P = 0.07), in residual aortic regurgitation (74% vs. 72% vs. 68%; P = 0.3) or postprocedure pacemaker implantation (38% vs. 30.4% vs. 34.2%; P = 0.35). During 30-day follow up there was no difference in regard to the number of death, strokes, and myocardial infarctions.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results of a real-world registry suggest that the extent of aortic valve calcification does not influence the success or procedural outcome significantly.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
22566406
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"