JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The dilemma in the diagnosis of acute scrotum: clinical clues for differentiating between testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute painful scrotum is one of the most challenging urological emergencies. Irreversible parenchymal damage will develop if a testicle is twisted. The aim of the study was to determine the importance of different clinical clues to help differentiate the causes of this devastating condition.

METHODS: The medical charts of teenagers with acute scrotal pain between January 2003 and December 2008 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in this study, including 47 initially suspected of having testicular torsion and 29 suspected of having epididymo-orchitis. Testicular torsion was confirmed in 39 of the suspected 47 cases after surgical exploration. Twnety-one of these 39 testicular torsion patients underwent orchiectomy, and 18 were rescued and underwent orchiopexy. The mean pain duration was significantly longer in the orchiectomy group than the orchiopexy group (38.05 hours vs 14.14 hours, p = 0.009). In the testicular torsion group, fewer patients had elevated C-reactive protein levels no patients had pyuria, and the pain duration was shorter compared with the epididymo-orchitis group (5/11 vs 13/22 [p = 0.045], 0/28 vs 8/28 [p = 0.004] and 27.0 vs 74.5 hours [p = 0.0003], respectively). The sensitivity of color Dopper ultrasound in diagnosing testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis was 84.09% vs 92.59%. Logistic regression for multivariate analysis showed that left side manifestation and pain duration were significantly different between testicular torsion and epididymo-orchitis with odds ratios of 4.76, p = 0.020 and 0.98, p = 0.029, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Pain duration and left side manifestation are independent risk factors of testicular torsion. Prompt surgical exploration should be done if testicular torsion is highly suspected.

Full text links

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app