Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Comparison of anterior knee pain between fixed-bearing prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of anterior knee pain between mobile-bearing prosthesis and fixed-hearing prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS: Between January 2008 and October 2008, 72 patients with osteoarthritis were treated with primary TKA. All patients were randomly divided into fixed-bearing prosthesis group (n = 37) and mobile-bearing prosthesis group (n = 35). In fixed-bearing prosthesis group, there were 8 males and 29 females with an average age of 69.6 years (range, 57-76 years), weighing from 55 to 92 kg (mean, 66.7 kg); the locations were the left knee in 20 cases and the right knee in 17 cases; the body mass index (BMI) ranged from 17.6 to 37.3 (mean, 26.2); the disease duration was 3-22 years; the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee score, function score, patellar score, and pain score were 29.4 +/- 15.3, 33.4 +/- 16.8, 7.2 +/- 2.5, and 2.5 +/- 2.2 respectively; and the Insall-Salvati (I-S) index was 1.6 +/- 0.3. In mobile-bearing prosthesis group, there were 9 males and 26 females with an average age of 68.2 years (range, 58-73 years), weighing from 50 to 86 kg (mean, 67.9 kg); the locations were the left knee in 30 cases and the right knee in 5 cases; the BMI ranged from 18.4 to 34.4 (mean, 25.6); the disease duration was 6-18 years; the KSS knee score, function score, patellar score, and pain score were 30.9 +/- 14.7, 31.4 +/- 14.4, 6.8 +/- 3.1, and 2.0 +/- 2.3, respectively; and the I-S index was 1.6 +/- 0.2. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P > 0.05).

RESULTS: All incisions healed by first intention; no deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs or pulmonary embolism occurred. All patients were followed up 12-16 months. In mobile-bearing prosthesis group, knee infection occurred in 1 case, dislocation of the knee in 1 case, and clicking of the knee in 3 cases; in fixed-bearing prosthesis group, clicking of the knee occurred in 1 case. There was no significant difference in KSS knee score, function score, patellar score, or pain score between 2 groups (P < 0.05) at last follow-up; and there was no significant difference in congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar displacement, patellar displacement, or I-S index between 2 groups at last follow-up (P > 0.05). Anterior knee pain occurred in 7 cases (18.9%) of the fixed-bearing prosthesis group and in 5 cases (14.3%) of the mobile-bearing prosthesis group, showing no significant difference (chi2 = 0.227, P = 0.634). There were significant differences in KSS knee score, function score, patellar score, and I-S index between patients with anterior knee pain and patients without anterior knee pain (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis have the same short-term effectiveness and the incidence of anterior knee pain.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app