Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Stapled transanal rectal resection for symptomatic intussusception: morphological and functional outcome.

Surgical Endoscopy 2010 August
INTRODUCTION: Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) was developed to correct intussusception causing obstructed defecation. Some patients, however, do not profit from this operation as anticipated. We aimed to study the relationship between functional outcome and rectal morphology after STARR.

METHODS: Fifteen consecutive female patients with median age of 64 years [interquartile range (IQR) 58-71 years] were studied before and after STARR. All patients had symptoms of obstructed defecation preoperatively. Pre- and postoperative workup consisted of standardized interview (including Wexner score) with physical examination including procto- and rectoscopy, anorectal manometry, and magnetic resonance (MR) defecography. Median follow up was 18 months (IQR 16-22 months).

RESULTS: STARR was technically successful in all 15 patients without intra- or postoperative complications. Median (IQR) Wexner score of fecal incontinence was 0 (0-0) before and 3 (0-4.5) after surgery (p < 0.05). While all patients had repetitive incomplete defecation preoperatively, this symptom was present in seven patients postoperatively (p < 0.01). Third-degree intussusception was diagnosed during MR defecography in all patients preoperatively. After surgery, no patient had third-degree intussusception but one patient had first-degree and one patient had second-degree intussusception (p < 0.05). Size of rectocele was reduced from 2.9 cm (2.0-3.8 cm) to 0.8 cm (0.6-1.9 cm) (p < 0.05). Sphincter pressures were unchanged during anorectal manometry; however, first sensation during balloon distension in the rectum decreased from 50 ml (40-83 ml) before surgery to 30 ml (25-40 ml) after surgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) achieved a high rate of morphological correction of intussusception; however, symptoms of obstructed defecation were not improved to the same extent, which warrants exploration in future studies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app