COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Prediction of return to productivity after severe traumatic brain injury: investigations of optimal neuropsychological tests and timing of assessment

Robin E Green, Brenda Colella, Deborah A Hebert, Mark Bayley, Han Sol Kang, Christine Till, Georges Monette
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008, 89 (12 Suppl): S51-60
19081442

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine predictive validity of global neuropsychological performance, and performance on timed tests (controlling for manual motor function) and untimed tests, including attention, memory, executive function, on return to productivity at 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). (2) To compare predictive validity at 8 weeks versus 5 months postinjury. (3) To examine predictive validity of early degree of recovery (8wk-5mo postinjury) for return to productivity.

DESIGN: Longitudinal, within subjects.

SETTING: Inpatient neurorehabilitation and community.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=63) with moderate to severe TBI.

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

PRIMARY OUTCOME: return to productivity at 1 year postinjury. Primary predictors: neuropsychological composite scores. Control variables: posttraumatic amnesia, acute care length of stay (LOS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, age, and estimated premorbid intelligence quotient.

RESULTS: Return to productivity was significantly correlated with global neuropsychological performance at 5 months postinjury (P<.05) and showed a trend toward significance at 8 weeks. Performance on the untimed composite score, and more specifically executive and memory functions, mirrored this pattern. Logical Memory performance significantly predicted return to productivity, but not other memory tests. Timed tests showed no significance or trend at either time point. Early degree of recovery did not predict return to productivity. Among control variables, only acute care LOS was predictive of return to productivity.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings validate utility of early neuropsychological assessment for predicting later return to productivity. They also provide more precise information regarding the optimal timing and test type: results support testing at 5 months postinjury on untimed tests (memory and executive function), but not simple attention or speed of mental processing. Findings are discussed with reference to previous literature.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19081442
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.