We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
[Influence of combining positive end-expiratory pressure with prone position on acute respiratory distress syndrome in pig].
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue = Chinese Critical Care Medicine = Zhongguo Weizhongbing Jijiuyixue 2008 October
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of combining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with prone position during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and its mechanism.
METHODS: Twelve healthy pigs were randomly divided into two groups according to the body posture during mechanical ventilation after oleic acid-induced lung injury: supine position group and prone position group. Three different PEEP levels of 0 (ZEEP), 10 (PEEP10) and 20 cm H2O (PEEP20, 1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa) were applied to each group one after another. Hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange were measured 15 minutes after each PEEP level was applied, and lung specimens for pathological examination were harvested after sacrifice of the animals.
RESULTS: Compared to supine position, prone position improved oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) at ZEEP and PEEP10 [ZEEP: (234.00+/-72.55) mm Hg vs. (106.58+/-34.93) mm Hg, PEEP10: (342.97+/-60.15) mm Hg vs. (246.80+/-83.69) mm Hg, 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa, both P<0.05 ], but not at PEEP20. No significant difference in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), compliance of the respiratory system (Cst) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were observed between groups at three PEEP levels. Compared with supine position, lung recruited volume (RV) was elevated in prone position at PEEP20 [(378.55+/-101.80) ml vs. (302.95+/-34.31) ml, P<0.05], but not at PEEP10. In supine group the dorsal regions of the lungs showed more severe injury than that in prone group (12.00+/-1.69 vs. 6.03+/-1.56, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: In pigs with ARDS, prone position improves PaO2/FiO2 significantly without influence on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics. Redistribution of lung injury may be one of the mechanisms of its beneficial effect.
METHODS: Twelve healthy pigs were randomly divided into two groups according to the body posture during mechanical ventilation after oleic acid-induced lung injury: supine position group and prone position group. Three different PEEP levels of 0 (ZEEP), 10 (PEEP10) and 20 cm H2O (PEEP20, 1 cm H2O=0.098 kPa) were applied to each group one after another. Hemodynamics, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange were measured 15 minutes after each PEEP level was applied, and lung specimens for pathological examination were harvested after sacrifice of the animals.
RESULTS: Compared to supine position, prone position improved oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) at ZEEP and PEEP10 [ZEEP: (234.00+/-72.55) mm Hg vs. (106.58+/-34.93) mm Hg, PEEP10: (342.97+/-60.15) mm Hg vs. (246.80+/-83.69) mm Hg, 1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa, both P<0.05 ], but not at PEEP20. No significant difference in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), compliance of the respiratory system (Cst) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were observed between groups at three PEEP levels. Compared with supine position, lung recruited volume (RV) was elevated in prone position at PEEP20 [(378.55+/-101.80) ml vs. (302.95+/-34.31) ml, P<0.05], but not at PEEP10. In supine group the dorsal regions of the lungs showed more severe injury than that in prone group (12.00+/-1.69 vs. 6.03+/-1.56, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: In pigs with ARDS, prone position improves PaO2/FiO2 significantly without influence on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics. Redistribution of lung injury may be one of the mechanisms of its beneficial effect.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app