We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Effect of membrane flux and dialyzer biocompatibility on survival in end-stage diabetic nephropathy.
AIMS: We examined the effects of dialyzer membrane flux and biocompatibility on mortality in diabetic dialysis patients.
METHODS: We enrolled 402 prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients from 30 centers in Germany in 1999 for a prospective observational study until 2003. We compared 2 groups in post hoc analysis: high-flux (HF, n = 166) versus low-flux (LF, n = 236) membrane, and high biocompatibility (HB, n = 300) versus low biocompatibility (LB, n = 102). All-cause mortality (ACM) was the primary endpoint. Death causes were the secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference in risk for ACM with respect to flux (hazard ratio, HR, 0.79; p = 0.08; ACM 63% in HF vs. 70% in LF dialysis) and biocompatibility level (HR 1.00; p = 0.98; ACM 67% for HB vs. 66% for LB). The multivariate analysis of different causes of death did not reveal any outcome differences dependent on flux and biocompatibility level apart from a slightly better cumulative survival regarding the death cause 'infectious' in our HF dialysis group (HR 0.48; p = 0.07, Kaplan-Meier analysis p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that mortality of hemodialysis patients with type-2 diabetic nephropathy is influenced neither by dialyzer flux level nor by biocompatibility.
METHODS: We enrolled 402 prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients from 30 centers in Germany in 1999 for a prospective observational study until 2003. We compared 2 groups in post hoc analysis: high-flux (HF, n = 166) versus low-flux (LF, n = 236) membrane, and high biocompatibility (HB, n = 300) versus low biocompatibility (LB, n = 102). All-cause mortality (ACM) was the primary endpoint. Death causes were the secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference in risk for ACM with respect to flux (hazard ratio, HR, 0.79; p = 0.08; ACM 63% in HF vs. 70% in LF dialysis) and biocompatibility level (HR 1.00; p = 0.98; ACM 67% for HB vs. 66% for LB). The multivariate analysis of different causes of death did not reveal any outcome differences dependent on flux and biocompatibility level apart from a slightly better cumulative survival regarding the death cause 'infectious' in our HF dialysis group (HR 0.48; p = 0.07, Kaplan-Meier analysis p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that mortality of hemodialysis patients with type-2 diabetic nephropathy is influenced neither by dialyzer flux level nor by biocompatibility.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app