JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW

[Measurement of cardiac output]

D A Reuter, A E Goetz
Der Anaesthesist 2005, 54 (11): 1135-51; quiz 1152-3
16228152
Diagnosis and therapy of hemodynamic instability are of the utmost importance in the treatment of critically ill patients during surgery and in intensive care. For both diagnosis and therapy, adequate and preferably continuous hemodynamic monitoring is essential. Besides the assessment of cardiac preload and blood pressure, cardiac output represents an important clinical marker of cardiac performance and global perfusion. Since its clinical introduction by Swan and Ganz in 1970, the standard technique for measuring cardiac output has been the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter. The ongoing discussion on the risk-benefit ratio of such a pulmonary artery catheter has led to the introduction of several less invasive methods for determining cardiac output. The aim of this review is to provide background information on these alternative methods and to discuss the individual advantages and disadvantages of each method in the context of their clinical applicability.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
16228152
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"