Peter J Hutchinson, Angelos G Kolias, Tamara Tajsic, Amos Adeleye, Abenezer Tirsit Aklilu, Tedy Apriawan, Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Ernest J Barthélemy, B Indira Devi, Dhananjaya Bhat, Diederik Bulters, Randall Chesnut, Giuseppe Citerio, D Jamie Cooper, Marek Czosnyka, Idara Edem, Nasser M F El-Ghandour, Anthony Figaji, Kostas N Fountas, Clare Gallagher, Gregory W J Hawryluk, Corrado Iaccarino, Mathew Joseph, Tariq Khan, Tsegazeab Laeke, Oleg Levchenko, Baiyun Liu, Weiming Liu, Andrew Maas, Geoffrey T Manley, Paul Manson, Anna T Mazzeo, David K Menon, Daniel B Michael, Susanne Muehlschlegel, David O Okonkwo, Kee B Park, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Gail Rosseau, Andres M Rubiano, Hamisi K Shabani, Nino Stocchetti, Shelly D Timmons, Ivan Timofeev, Chris Uff, Jamie S Ullman, Alex Valadka, Vicknes Waran, Adam Wells, Mark H Wilson, Franco Servadei
BACKGROUND: Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach. METHODS: The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017...
July 2019: Acta Neurochirurgica