We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
A comparison of the cavitation potential of prosthetic heart valves based on valve closing dynamics.
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 1998 November
BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study compares the cavitation potential of prosthetic heart valves based on valve closing dynamics.
METHODS: A laser sweeping technique measured valve closing dynamics (average closing velocity and deceleration) immediately before valve closure. A high-fidelity, piezoelectric pressure transducer was mounted proximal to the mitral valve and measured the high-frequency pressure fluctuations caused by cavitation bubble formation and collapse after valve closure. The band-pass filtered root mean squared (RMS) value of the mitral pressure signal was used as a measure of cavitation intensity. The combination of these two techniques allowed the direct correlation of valve dynamics and cavitation intensity for each valve closure. The effects of three parameters on prosthetic heart valve dynamics and cavitation were examined: valve geometry (Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley Monostrut), occluder material (pyrolytic carbon and Delrin), and gap width between the occluder and housing. A dimensional analysis was also performed to investigate the general form of the relationship between valve dynamics and cavitation intensity.
RESULTS: For all of the valves investigated in this study, the RMS pressure increased (signifying an increase in cavitation) as the average closing velocity and deceleration increased. In order to compare the cavitation potential of the valves, the RMS pressure was estimated at specific closing velocities using the linear regression of RMS pressure versus average closing velocity for each valve. The effects of valve geometry, occluder material and gap width were then examined at high valve loading conditions (closing velocity of 4.0 m/s). For both pyrolytic carbon and Delrin, the Medtronic Hall valves had significantly higher RMS pressures than did the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valves. For a given valve geometry, the pyrolytic carbon occluder had a significantly higher RMS pressure than the Delrin occluder. The valve gap width did not have a significant effect on RMS pressure. The dimensional analysis revealed the general relationship among average closing velocity, occluder material properties and cavitation intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here contribute to our fundamental understanding of cavitation on mechanical heart valves.
METHODS: A laser sweeping technique measured valve closing dynamics (average closing velocity and deceleration) immediately before valve closure. A high-fidelity, piezoelectric pressure transducer was mounted proximal to the mitral valve and measured the high-frequency pressure fluctuations caused by cavitation bubble formation and collapse after valve closure. The band-pass filtered root mean squared (RMS) value of the mitral pressure signal was used as a measure of cavitation intensity. The combination of these two techniques allowed the direct correlation of valve dynamics and cavitation intensity for each valve closure. The effects of three parameters on prosthetic heart valve dynamics and cavitation were examined: valve geometry (Medtronic Hall and Björk-Shiley Monostrut), occluder material (pyrolytic carbon and Delrin), and gap width between the occluder and housing. A dimensional analysis was also performed to investigate the general form of the relationship between valve dynamics and cavitation intensity.
RESULTS: For all of the valves investigated in this study, the RMS pressure increased (signifying an increase in cavitation) as the average closing velocity and deceleration increased. In order to compare the cavitation potential of the valves, the RMS pressure was estimated at specific closing velocities using the linear regression of RMS pressure versus average closing velocity for each valve. The effects of valve geometry, occluder material and gap width were then examined at high valve loading conditions (closing velocity of 4.0 m/s). For both pyrolytic carbon and Delrin, the Medtronic Hall valves had significantly higher RMS pressures than did the Björk-Shiley Monostrut valves. For a given valve geometry, the pyrolytic carbon occluder had a significantly higher RMS pressure than the Delrin occluder. The valve gap width did not have a significant effect on RMS pressure. The dimensional analysis revealed the general relationship among average closing velocity, occluder material properties and cavitation intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here contribute to our fundamental understanding of cavitation on mechanical heart valves.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app