We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Cabergoline in acromegaly: a renewed role for dopamine agonist treatment?
European Journal of Endocrinology 1998 November
OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Eighteen active acromegalics entered a prospective open study with cabergoline (CAB), a dopaminergic drug much more potent than bromocriptine (Br).
METHODS: CAB was administered for 6 months at doses ranging between 0.5 mg twice weekly and 0.5 mg/day. Clinical-anamnestic characteristics of the patients were: (i) sensitivity to dopamine agonist drugs (10 patients); (ii) resistance to somatostatin analogs (SAs) (8 patients): (iii) intolerance to SA (3 patients). In 2 patients marked hyperprolactinemia was present.
RESULTS: Basal GH was 6.6 microg/l (2.2-50) (median (range)), and on treatment it was 3.5 microg/l (1.2-34) (P=0.013). The corresponding IGF-I values were 720 microg/l (410-1438) and 375 microg/l (167-1260) respectively (P=0.00001). Individual GH levels decreased below 2 microg/l in 5 patients, and between 2 and 5 microg/l in another 5 patients. IGF-I levels were suppressed below 50% of baseline in 8 patients and normal age-adjusted IGF-I values were reached in 5 patients (27% of the series). The retrospective comparison with previous chronic treatment with Br in the 10 suitable patients showed a greater effectiveness of CAB (IGF-I decrease on CAB treatment, 46.8%, on Br treatment, 31%, P=0.02). Adenoma shrank in the 3 patients whose pituitary imaging was repeated during CAB.
CONCLUSIONS: These results envisage that CAB may represent a worthy therapeutic tool in acromegalic patients, inducing a degree of IGF-I and GH suppression comparable to SAs, administered by the oral route and much less expensive.
METHODS: CAB was administered for 6 months at doses ranging between 0.5 mg twice weekly and 0.5 mg/day. Clinical-anamnestic characteristics of the patients were: (i) sensitivity to dopamine agonist drugs (10 patients); (ii) resistance to somatostatin analogs (SAs) (8 patients): (iii) intolerance to SA (3 patients). In 2 patients marked hyperprolactinemia was present.
RESULTS: Basal GH was 6.6 microg/l (2.2-50) (median (range)), and on treatment it was 3.5 microg/l (1.2-34) (P=0.013). The corresponding IGF-I values were 720 microg/l (410-1438) and 375 microg/l (167-1260) respectively (P=0.00001). Individual GH levels decreased below 2 microg/l in 5 patients, and between 2 and 5 microg/l in another 5 patients. IGF-I levels were suppressed below 50% of baseline in 8 patients and normal age-adjusted IGF-I values were reached in 5 patients (27% of the series). The retrospective comparison with previous chronic treatment with Br in the 10 suitable patients showed a greater effectiveness of CAB (IGF-I decrease on CAB treatment, 46.8%, on Br treatment, 31%, P=0.02). Adenoma shrank in the 3 patients whose pituitary imaging was repeated during CAB.
CONCLUSIONS: These results envisage that CAB may represent a worthy therapeutic tool in acromegalic patients, inducing a degree of IGF-I and GH suppression comparable to SAs, administered by the oral route and much less expensive.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app