We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of grade.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1998 November
PURPOSE: A substantial proportion of the propulsive forces required for uphill skiing are generated from the upper body, but no study has systematically examined poling forces at different slopes. In the present experiment, poling forces and timing were examined during roller skiing on 2.1% and 5.1% uphills.
METHODS: Nine highly skilled cross-country skiers roller skied at paced submaximal and at maximal speeds using the V1 skate (V1) and double pole (DP) techniques. Poling forces and timing were measured with piezoelectric transducers.
RESULTS: Peak force (PF), average force (AF) and average force over the entire cycle (ACF) were significantly greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade with both techniques. Values for the ratio of V1 to DP did not differ between the two grades for PF, AF, and ACF but tended to increase with velocity for both techniques. With both V1 and DP, upper body recovery time was shorter (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade, and cycle rate was greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) the relative demands on the upper body with V1 compared with DP were similar between the two grades, and 2) the responses to an elevation in grade of increased poling forces, shortened poling recovery times, and increased cycle rate are comparable to the responses to an increase in speed.
METHODS: Nine highly skilled cross-country skiers roller skied at paced submaximal and at maximal speeds using the V1 skate (V1) and double pole (DP) techniques. Poling forces and timing were measured with piezoelectric transducers.
RESULTS: Peak force (PF), average force (AF) and average force over the entire cycle (ACF) were significantly greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade with both techniques. Values for the ratio of V1 to DP did not differ between the two grades for PF, AF, and ACF but tended to increase with velocity for both techniques. With both V1 and DP, upper body recovery time was shorter (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade, and cycle rate was greater (P < 0.01) at the steeper grade.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 1) the relative demands on the upper body with V1 compared with DP were similar between the two grades, and 2) the responses to an elevation in grade of increased poling forces, shortened poling recovery times, and increased cycle rate are comparable to the responses to an increase in speed.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app