Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Foot and ankle reconstruction using the radial forearm flap: a review of 25 cases.

Twenty-five patients underwent soft-tissue reconstruction of the different anatomic regions of the foot and ankle using the microvascular radial forearm free flap. The patients, 19 men and 6 women, ranged in age from 3 to 80 years (mean, 48.4 years). Indications for the surgery included diabetes and/or vascular insufficiency (10 patients), trauma (9 patients), tumor (3 patients), gunshot wound (2 patients), and burn (1 patient). Osteomyelitis occurred in patients with traumatic (3 patients) and diabetic (3 patients) wounds. The weight-bearing surface of the foot was involved in eight patients. Defects ranged in size from 45 to 210 cm2 (mean, 100.4 cm2). The radial forearm flap was successful in 23 of 25 cases (92 percent). Flap complications included flap loss (two patients), infection (three patients), and minor wound dehiscence at the flap-leg skin interface (two patients). Recurrent ulceration occurred in two patients; both were diabetics with weight-bearing flaps. Donor site complications included partial skin graft loss with tendon exposure in two patients; both healed with conservative management. Recurrent or persistent osteomyelitis was not seen in any of the patients. Of the eight patients with weight-bearing flaps, four were ambulatory, one had limited ambulation, one was nonambulatory, one had too short a follow-up, and one suffered flap loss. Two patients required modified shoes. Debulking was performed in one patient. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 72 months (mean, 24.9 months). The radial forearm flap meets most of the anatomic prerequisites for the ideal foot flap. It facilitates the restoration of normal foot contour by replacing "like-with-like," allowing patients to use normal shoes without the need for debulking (except in one patient); it provides a durable and stable weight-bearing plantar surface during ambulation; it achieves excellent aesthetic results without the dryness or cracking of the hypertrophied skin-grafted muscle; and it permits sensory reinnervation. We have found it especially useful for resurfacing the dorsum, ankle, and forefoot, moderate-sized defects, weight-bearing surfaces, and osteomyelitic wounds.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app