We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
English Abstract
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
[Dexpanthenol nasal spray as an effective therapeutic principle for treatment of rhinitis sicca anterior].
Laryngo- Rhino- Otologie 1998 September
BACKGROUND: Controlled clinical studies on medical treatment of rhinitis sicca anterior have not yet been published. Therapy recommendations are based on experiences but not on results of controlled clinical studies. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and tolerance of a new form of application of Dexpanthenol in physiologic saline solution (Nasicur).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized comparison of parallel groups was performed. One group was treated with the nasal spray while the control group received a placebo. The assessment of nasal breathing resistance and the extent of crust formation according to scores were defined as target parameters. Statistical analysis was carried out according to Wilcoxon at alpha < or = 0.05.
RESULTS: Forty-eight outpatients diagnosed with rhinitis sicca anterior were included in this study. Twenty-four received the medication, and 29 were treated with a placebo. The superiority of the dexpanthenol nasal spray in comparison to the placebo medication was demonstrated for both target parameters as clinically relevant and statistically significant. The placebo spray showed clinical improvement of the other treatment outcome parameters. Dexpanthenol nasal spray showed no statistically significant difference in comparison to placebo. The clinically proven efficacy is emphasized by good tolerance of both treatments which was validated by the objective rhinoscopy findings. Good compliance was confirmed.
CONCLUSION: The result of the controlled clinical study confirms that the dexpanthenol nasal spray is an effective medicinal treatment of rhinitis sicca anterior and is more effective than common medications.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized comparison of parallel groups was performed. One group was treated with the nasal spray while the control group received a placebo. The assessment of nasal breathing resistance and the extent of crust formation according to scores were defined as target parameters. Statistical analysis was carried out according to Wilcoxon at alpha < or = 0.05.
RESULTS: Forty-eight outpatients diagnosed with rhinitis sicca anterior were included in this study. Twenty-four received the medication, and 29 were treated with a placebo. The superiority of the dexpanthenol nasal spray in comparison to the placebo medication was demonstrated for both target parameters as clinically relevant and statistically significant. The placebo spray showed clinical improvement of the other treatment outcome parameters. Dexpanthenol nasal spray showed no statistically significant difference in comparison to placebo. The clinically proven efficacy is emphasized by good tolerance of both treatments which was validated by the objective rhinoscopy findings. Good compliance was confirmed.
CONCLUSION: The result of the controlled clinical study confirms that the dexpanthenol nasal spray is an effective medicinal treatment of rhinitis sicca anterior and is more effective than common medications.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app