We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Utilization and predictive value of laboratory tests in patients referred to rheumatologists by primary care physicians.
Journal of Rheumatology 1998 October
OBJECTIVE: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factors (RF), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are among the most frequently requested tests in the diagnosis and investigation of connective tissue diseases (CTD). We evaluate the utilization patterns and predictive value of these tests in patients referred to rheumatologists by primary care physicians.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all new patients referred by primary care physicians in 1994 to 2 rheumatologists practicing at the University of Alberta. Data extracted from the records included diagnostic tests requested by referring primary care physicians, signs and symptoms at the initial rheumatology consult, and followup diagnoses.
RESULTS: Seven hundred eleven new patients had been referred by over 300 primary care physicians: RF had been requested in 25%, ANA in 21%, and ESR in 29%. One hundred nine (15%) of the 711 patients had a CTD, 45 (6%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 8 (1%) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The predictive values of positive tests for the diagnosis of CTD were low: 49% for RF, 29% for ANA, and 35% for ESR. For RA, the positive predictive values were 44% for RF, 8% for ANA, 17% for ESR; for SLE, 2, 12, and 3%, respectively. Diffuse musculoskeletal pain and fatigue were significantly associated with test utilization, although most patients with these symptoms had fibromyalgia or localized soft tissue rheumatism.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians frequently requested autoantibodies in patients referred to rheumatologists. Most tests were negative, and were often requested in patients without CTD, resulting in low positive predictive values and questionable clinical utility. These findings suggest inappropriate overuse and lack of understanding of the use of autoantibody tests in diagnosing rheumatic diseases. A decrease in inappropriate use could be achieved by emphasizing that fatigue and diffuse musculoskeletal pain are not indicative of CTD in the absence of other features such as joint swelling, typical rash, or organ involvement.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all new patients referred by primary care physicians in 1994 to 2 rheumatologists practicing at the University of Alberta. Data extracted from the records included diagnostic tests requested by referring primary care physicians, signs and symptoms at the initial rheumatology consult, and followup diagnoses.
RESULTS: Seven hundred eleven new patients had been referred by over 300 primary care physicians: RF had been requested in 25%, ANA in 21%, and ESR in 29%. One hundred nine (15%) of the 711 patients had a CTD, 45 (6%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 8 (1%) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The predictive values of positive tests for the diagnosis of CTD were low: 49% for RF, 29% for ANA, and 35% for ESR. For RA, the positive predictive values were 44% for RF, 8% for ANA, 17% for ESR; for SLE, 2, 12, and 3%, respectively. Diffuse musculoskeletal pain and fatigue were significantly associated with test utilization, although most patients with these symptoms had fibromyalgia or localized soft tissue rheumatism.
CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians frequently requested autoantibodies in patients referred to rheumatologists. Most tests were negative, and were often requested in patients without CTD, resulting in low positive predictive values and questionable clinical utility. These findings suggest inappropriate overuse and lack of understanding of the use of autoantibody tests in diagnosing rheumatic diseases. A decrease in inappropriate use could be achieved by emphasizing that fatigue and diffuse musculoskeletal pain are not indicative of CTD in the absence of other features such as joint swelling, typical rash, or organ involvement.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app