We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
An overview of recent studies on the potential of pulp-mill effluents to alter reproductive parameters in fish.
In the early 1990s, many Canadian pulp and paper mills implemented process changes to comply with new regulations that came into effect in 1993. These regulations placed stricter guidelines on a number of parameters in effluent discharges, including limits on acute toxicity, on the discharges of suspended solids, and on biochemical oxygen demand. To meet these new regulations, many of the older Canadian pulp and paper mills had to install secondary treatment systems. The investment by the Canadian pulp and paper industry was in excess of $5 billion, and the implementation of the new regulations and the process changes took several years. The new regulations were an extension of regulations designed in the early 1970s and were not designed specifically to address the reproductive responses recently reported in fish collected downstream of mills in Scandinavia and North America. This report describes a series of projects conducted between 1991 and 1996 to evaluate the effectiveness of the new regulations to address the issue of reproductive responses in fish associated with exposure to pulp-mill effluents. These studies have shown that the existing short-term bioassays do not adequately predict the potential of effluents to affect reproduction in wild fish. Laboratory testing using fathead minnows exposed over a full life cycle confirmed depression in sex steroid production, delay in sexual maturity, reduced egg production, and changes in secondary sex characteristics documented at some sites. Our studies demonstrated that both steroid hormone changes and induction of liver detoxification enzymes take place quickly. While short-term exposures can predict the potential of some effluents to impact steroid hormone production, there is no readily available assay that can be widely applied. In the absence of a usable and transferable laboratory bioassay, field collections were conducted at a number of sites. Generalizations are not possible at this time, but impacts have been seen at a variety of sites, and partial recovery has been documented at five sites in North America following various process and waste treatment changes. Data gaps and critical research areas are identified.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app