We have located links that may give you full text access.
FDG uptake, GLUT-1 glucose transporter and cellularity in human pancreatic tumors.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1998 October
UNLABELLED: We previously reported that grading of GLUT-1 glucose transporter expression was related closely to FDG accumulation in FDG PET in human cancers. But in this strong GLUT-1 expression group, there was an enormous range of standardized uptake values (SUVs) within them.
METHODS: To evaluate other factors determining the FDG PET uptake, FDG PET was performed in 36 preoperative patients (mean age 62.0 yr) suspected of having pancreatic tumors, including 33 malignant and 3 benign neoplastic tumors. FDG uptake at 50 min after injection of 185 MBq 18F-FDG with > 5 hr fasting condition was semiquantitatively analyzed as SUVs. The GLUT-1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections from these tumors after the operation using the antiGLUT-1 antibody. The number of tumor cells within a 5- x 5-mm square was counted manually using x200 magnification photographs and was graded immunohistochemically as strong, weak or negative.
RESULTS: In all 36 cases there were 3 cases of GLUT-1 negative, 8 of GLUT-1 weak positive and 25 of GLUT-1 strong positive. In all cases, the total number of tumor cells had no significant value for SUVs. Among 33 GLUT-1 positive cases, the number of GLUT-1 positive tumor cells correlated significantly with SUVs (p < 0.01). Only in 25 strong grade cases, the number of GLUT-1 strong positive tumor cells had a more significant value for SUVs (p < 0.005). Computational multivariate analysis using multiple regression for SUVs was performed evaluating the five variables as follows: tumor size, GLUT-1 immunohistochemical grading, number of total tumor cells, number of total GLUT-1 positive tumor cells and number of GLUT-1 strong positive cells. This analysis revealed that only the variable, the number of GLUT-1 strong positive cells, had a significant regression coefficient for SUVs (standard regression coefficient = 0.855, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that GLUT-1 expression plays an essential role in higher FDG accumulation in pancreatic tumor FDG PET, and the cellularity has a significant influence on SUVs only in the condition of GLUT-1 strong positive expression.
METHODS: To evaluate other factors determining the FDG PET uptake, FDG PET was performed in 36 preoperative patients (mean age 62.0 yr) suspected of having pancreatic tumors, including 33 malignant and 3 benign neoplastic tumors. FDG uptake at 50 min after injection of 185 MBq 18F-FDG with > 5 hr fasting condition was semiquantitatively analyzed as SUVs. The GLUT-1 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections from these tumors after the operation using the antiGLUT-1 antibody. The number of tumor cells within a 5- x 5-mm square was counted manually using x200 magnification photographs and was graded immunohistochemically as strong, weak or negative.
RESULTS: In all 36 cases there were 3 cases of GLUT-1 negative, 8 of GLUT-1 weak positive and 25 of GLUT-1 strong positive. In all cases, the total number of tumor cells had no significant value for SUVs. Among 33 GLUT-1 positive cases, the number of GLUT-1 positive tumor cells correlated significantly with SUVs (p < 0.01). Only in 25 strong grade cases, the number of GLUT-1 strong positive tumor cells had a more significant value for SUVs (p < 0.005). Computational multivariate analysis using multiple regression for SUVs was performed evaluating the five variables as follows: tumor size, GLUT-1 immunohistochemical grading, number of total tumor cells, number of total GLUT-1 positive tumor cells and number of GLUT-1 strong positive cells. This analysis revealed that only the variable, the number of GLUT-1 strong positive cells, had a significant regression coefficient for SUVs (standard regression coefficient = 0.855, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that GLUT-1 expression plays an essential role in higher FDG accumulation in pancreatic tumor FDG PET, and the cellularity has a significant influence on SUVs only in the condition of GLUT-1 strong positive expression.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app