We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Angiotensin II blockade followed by growth hormone as adjunctive therapy after experimental myocardial infarction.
Journal of Cardiac Failure 1998 September
BACKGROUND: Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has shown beneficial effects on cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI) in rats. High-dose angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockade in normal rats inhibited the hypertrophic effect of growth hormone (GH), therefore we investigated whether GH effects after MI would be enhanced by giving it in sequence after remodeling had been inhibited by prior AT1 blockade (losartan, L).
METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats given losartan for 10 weeks after MI followed by rhGH for 2 weeks (2 mg/kg twice a day, GH plus losartan) were compared with rats given losartan for 10 weeks followed by placebo for 2 weeks (placebo plus losartan group) and with untreated controls (n = 17-20/group). Average MI sizes and left ventricular (LV) end diastolic (ED) dimensions (echocardiography) did not differ between groups. In GH and losartan, body weight (BW) was increased but left ventricular weight (LVW)/BW was reduced, and the LV fractional shortening and LV dP/dtmax (catheter tip micromanometer) were increased compared with the control group (20.3 vs 15.4% and 5579 vs 4699 mmHg/s, respectively, P < .05). The cardiac index also was significantly increased. In the placebo plus losartan group, the LVW/BW was also reduced and the cardiac index increased versus controls. Stroke volume was increased in GH plus losartan group compared with both placebo plus losartan and controls, and the systemic vascular resistance was significantly decreased only in the GH plus losartan group. The ED posterior wall thickness (noninfarcted wall) was increased in GH plus losartan compared with both control and placebo plus losartan. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure reduction was not significant in GH plus losartan group versus controls but was reduced in placebo plus losartan group, whereas LV relaxation (tau) was improved in both groups versus control rats. Thus, persistent remodeling effects caused by prior AT1 blockade undoubtedly contributed to some responses, but short-term GH given in sequence after chronic AT1 blockade had favorable actions on the failing heart and peripheral circulation by increasing LV wall thickness with partial reversal of unfavorable remodeling, lowering of vascular resistance, improvement of LV contractility, and enhanced LV systolic function and cardiac index relatively late after experimental MI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats given losartan for 10 weeks after MI followed by rhGH for 2 weeks (2 mg/kg twice a day, GH plus losartan) were compared with rats given losartan for 10 weeks followed by placebo for 2 weeks (placebo plus losartan group) and with untreated controls (n = 17-20/group). Average MI sizes and left ventricular (LV) end diastolic (ED) dimensions (echocardiography) did not differ between groups. In GH and losartan, body weight (BW) was increased but left ventricular weight (LVW)/BW was reduced, and the LV fractional shortening and LV dP/dtmax (catheter tip micromanometer) were increased compared with the control group (20.3 vs 15.4% and 5579 vs 4699 mmHg/s, respectively, P < .05). The cardiac index also was significantly increased. In the placebo plus losartan group, the LVW/BW was also reduced and the cardiac index increased versus controls. Stroke volume was increased in GH plus losartan group compared with both placebo plus losartan and controls, and the systemic vascular resistance was significantly decreased only in the GH plus losartan group. The ED posterior wall thickness (noninfarcted wall) was increased in GH plus losartan compared with both control and placebo plus losartan. Left ventricular end diastolic pressure reduction was not significant in GH plus losartan group versus controls but was reduced in placebo plus losartan group, whereas LV relaxation (tau) was improved in both groups versus control rats. Thus, persistent remodeling effects caused by prior AT1 blockade undoubtedly contributed to some responses, but short-term GH given in sequence after chronic AT1 blockade had favorable actions on the failing heart and peripheral circulation by increasing LV wall thickness with partial reversal of unfavorable remodeling, lowering of vascular resistance, improvement of LV contractility, and enhanced LV systolic function and cardiac index relatively late after experimental MI.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app