We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Factor V Leiden, activated protein C resistance, and retinal vein occlusion.
Retina 1998
BACKGROUND: Resistance to activated protein C (APC resistance) is a thrombophilic abnormality characterized by a normal plasma level of protein C and an inherited defect in the coagulative response. This condition is believed to be caused by a point mutation in factor V, the so-called factor V Leiden, and is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait.
PURPOSE: A case-control study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of APC resistance and factor V Leiden in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and in control subjects.
METHODS: Eighty-four consecutive RVO patients and 70 controls were tested for APC resistance with a commercial assay (Chromogenix). The first 30 patients and 47 controls were also studied for factor V Leiden. In addition, a repeat APC-resistance test was performed in 40 RVO patients and in 9 controls with a second-generation assay done to compare the reliability and reproducibility of the tests.
RESULTS: Results of testing for APC resistance with the first-generation assay revealed positive results in 38 (45%) of the study patients and 6 (9%) of the controls. The difference in frequencies of APC resistance in patients and controls was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In the patients tested for factor V Leiden, one (3%) was a heterozygous carrier of the Arg506GIn mutation and one (2%) of the controls was a heterozygous carrier. No homozygous individuals were identified in either the study or the control groups. The difference in frequencies of factor V Leiden in study patients and controls was not statistically significant (P = 1). The repeat APC-resistance assay using factor V-deficient plasma in 40 RVO patients and 9 controls did not show any significant difference between study patients and controls or an association between APC resistance and the determination of the factor V Leiden mutant.
CONCLUSION: The first-generation commercial assay for APC resistance is not a useful screening test. The molecular test for factor V Leiden is the only definitive method. Furthermore, no significant association was found between factor V Leiden and retinal vein occlusion. Accordingly, routine testing for the presence of the factor V Leiden mutant is not advisable for patients with retinal vein occlusion.
PURPOSE: A case-control study was carried out to evaluate the prevalence of APC resistance and factor V Leiden in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and in control subjects.
METHODS: Eighty-four consecutive RVO patients and 70 controls were tested for APC resistance with a commercial assay (Chromogenix). The first 30 patients and 47 controls were also studied for factor V Leiden. In addition, a repeat APC-resistance test was performed in 40 RVO patients and in 9 controls with a second-generation assay done to compare the reliability and reproducibility of the tests.
RESULTS: Results of testing for APC resistance with the first-generation assay revealed positive results in 38 (45%) of the study patients and 6 (9%) of the controls. The difference in frequencies of APC resistance in patients and controls was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In the patients tested for factor V Leiden, one (3%) was a heterozygous carrier of the Arg506GIn mutation and one (2%) of the controls was a heterozygous carrier. No homozygous individuals were identified in either the study or the control groups. The difference in frequencies of factor V Leiden in study patients and controls was not statistically significant (P = 1). The repeat APC-resistance assay using factor V-deficient plasma in 40 RVO patients and 9 controls did not show any significant difference between study patients and controls or an association between APC resistance and the determination of the factor V Leiden mutant.
CONCLUSION: The first-generation commercial assay for APC resistance is not a useful screening test. The molecular test for factor V Leiden is the only definitive method. Furthermore, no significant association was found between factor V Leiden and retinal vein occlusion. Accordingly, routine testing for the presence of the factor V Leiden mutant is not advisable for patients with retinal vein occlusion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app