We have located links that may give you full text access.
Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass grafting.
OBJECTIVE: A new device, using whole body bioresistance measurements and a new equation for calculating stroke volume has been developed. Using this equation, an attempt was made to correlate whole body bioresistance cardiac output with thermodilution cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: Thirty-one adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were studied prospectively. Simultaneous paired cardiac output measurements by whole body bioresistance and thermodilution were made at five time points during coronary artery bypass grafting: in anesthetized patients before incision (T1), after sternotomy (T2), after opening the pericardium (T3), ten min post bypass (T4), and in the intensive care unit (T5). The patients had a mean of three thermodilution cardiac outputs compared with a mean of three bioimpedance measurements at each time point. The bias and precision between the methods were calculated.
RESULTS: There was good correlation between bioresistance cardiac output (nCO) and thermodilution cardiac output (ThCO) measurements in both groups for all recorded times. The patients' mean ThCO and nCO, as well as bias and precision between methods were calculated. Mean ThCO ranged between 4.14 and 5.06 l/min; mean nCO ranged between 4.12 and 4.97 l/ min. Bias calculations ranged between -0.072 and 0.104 l/min. Precision (2 SD) calculations ranged between 0.873 and 1.228 l/min for 95% confidence intervals. Pearson's correlation ranged from 0.919 to 0.938.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output measured with the new device correlates well with the thermodilution measurements of cardiac output during and immediately following coronary artery bypass grafting. The overall agreement between the two methods was good. The new device is an accurate non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output during coronary artery bypass grafting.
METHODS: Thirty-one adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were studied prospectively. Simultaneous paired cardiac output measurements by whole body bioresistance and thermodilution were made at five time points during coronary artery bypass grafting: in anesthetized patients before incision (T1), after sternotomy (T2), after opening the pericardium (T3), ten min post bypass (T4), and in the intensive care unit (T5). The patients had a mean of three thermodilution cardiac outputs compared with a mean of three bioimpedance measurements at each time point. The bias and precision between the methods were calculated.
RESULTS: There was good correlation between bioresistance cardiac output (nCO) and thermodilution cardiac output (ThCO) measurements in both groups for all recorded times. The patients' mean ThCO and nCO, as well as bias and precision between methods were calculated. Mean ThCO ranged between 4.14 and 5.06 l/min; mean nCO ranged between 4.12 and 4.97 l/ min. Bias calculations ranged between -0.072 and 0.104 l/min. Precision (2 SD) calculations ranged between 0.873 and 1.228 l/min for 95% confidence intervals. Pearson's correlation ranged from 0.919 to 0.938.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output measured with the new device correlates well with the thermodilution measurements of cardiac output during and immediately following coronary artery bypass grafting. The overall agreement between the two methods was good. The new device is an accurate non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output during coronary artery bypass grafting.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app