We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
A comparison of laser Doppler fluxmetry and transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement in the dysvascular patient requiring amputation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive power of laser Doppler fluxmetry (LDF), both heated and unheated, as a preoperative investigation of wound healing potential in dysvascular patients requiring amputation, by comparison with transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurement (TcpO2) and the limb to chest TcpO2 index.
METHODS: Thirty-five non-diabetic patients with peripheral vascular disease were investigated before amputation. Heated and unheated LDF and heated TcpO2 measurements were taken on the chest wall and at the routine above-knee, below-knee and mid-foot amputation levels. Wound healing potential was evaluated against a TcpO2 index value of 0.55 and on clinical outcome.
RESULTS: A heated LDF value of 4.9 arbitrary units (au) was shown by receiver-operator characteristic curve to have the best predictive power, with an overall accuracy for preoperative prediction of wound healing of 91.4%, and a predictive value for wound failure of 89%. Based on the heated LDF of 4.9 au, review of 26 amputations performed shows the overall accuracy for preoperative prediction of wound healing of 92.3%, a predictive value for wound healing of 100%, and a predictive value for wound failure of 62.5%.
CONCLUSION: A heated LDF value of 4.9 au appears to be a useful predictor of the potential of an amputation site to heal.
METHODS: Thirty-five non-diabetic patients with peripheral vascular disease were investigated before amputation. Heated and unheated LDF and heated TcpO2 measurements were taken on the chest wall and at the routine above-knee, below-knee and mid-foot amputation levels. Wound healing potential was evaluated against a TcpO2 index value of 0.55 and on clinical outcome.
RESULTS: A heated LDF value of 4.9 arbitrary units (au) was shown by receiver-operator characteristic curve to have the best predictive power, with an overall accuracy for preoperative prediction of wound healing of 91.4%, and a predictive value for wound failure of 89%. Based on the heated LDF of 4.9 au, review of 26 amputations performed shows the overall accuracy for preoperative prediction of wound healing of 92.3%, a predictive value for wound healing of 100%, and a predictive value for wound failure of 62.5%.
CONCLUSION: A heated LDF value of 4.9 au appears to be a useful predictor of the potential of an amputation site to heal.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app