We have located links that may give you full text access.
Placenta praevia and accreta: analysis of a two-year experience.
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 1998 August
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the relationship between previous caesarean section and subsequent development of placenta praevia and placenta praevia with accreta.
METHOD: A retrospective review of the case records of all women delivered with the diagnosis of placenta praevia during the 2-year period from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996, at the tertiary referral centre, Princess Badeea Teaching Hospital, in north Jordan.
RESULTS: There were 18, 651 deliveries in the study period. 65 (0.35%) had placenta praevia, 21 (32.3%) of whom had a history of previous caesarean section. The incidence of placenta praevia was significantly increased in those with a previous caesarean section (1.87%) compared with those with an unscarred uterus (0.25%); p < 0.0001). This risk increased as the number of previous caesarean sections increased: 1.78% for one previous section; 2.4% for two, and 2.8% for three or more. The incidence of anterior placenta praevia and placenta accreta was significantly increased in those with previous caesarean scars. In the group without antecedent of caesarean section, accretism risk was 9%, with one section or more 40.8% (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: There is a high association between anterior placenta praevia, placenta accreta and previous caesarean section. This was enhanced with the increasing number of previous caesarean sections. Patients with an antepartum diagnosis of placenta praevia who have had a previous caesarean section should be considered at high risk of developing placenta praevia and accreta.
METHOD: A retrospective review of the case records of all women delivered with the diagnosis of placenta praevia during the 2-year period from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1996, at the tertiary referral centre, Princess Badeea Teaching Hospital, in north Jordan.
RESULTS: There were 18, 651 deliveries in the study period. 65 (0.35%) had placenta praevia, 21 (32.3%) of whom had a history of previous caesarean section. The incidence of placenta praevia was significantly increased in those with a previous caesarean section (1.87%) compared with those with an unscarred uterus (0.25%); p < 0.0001). This risk increased as the number of previous caesarean sections increased: 1.78% for one previous section; 2.4% for two, and 2.8% for three or more. The incidence of anterior placenta praevia and placenta accreta was significantly increased in those with previous caesarean scars. In the group without antecedent of caesarean section, accretism risk was 9%, with one section or more 40.8% (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: There is a high association between anterior placenta praevia, placenta accreta and previous caesarean section. This was enhanced with the increasing number of previous caesarean sections. Patients with an antepartum diagnosis of placenta praevia who have had a previous caesarean section should be considered at high risk of developing placenta praevia and accreta.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app