Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The relationship between staff burnout/distress and interactions with residents in two residential homes for older people.

OBJECTIVE: The main hypothesis was that staff burnout/distress would be negatively associated with the quantity and quality of social interactions between staff and residents. The subsidiary hypothesis hypothesis was that 'perceived involvement in decision-making' among staff would be positively associated with the quantity and quality of staff-resident interactions.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional and within-group. Standardized self-report questionnaires completed by staff; and non-participant, time-sampling observation and coding of staff-resident interactions. SETTING. Two independent (not-for-profit) residential care homes for older people in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS: 18 out of 24 residential workers completed questionnaires.

MEASURES: The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12); the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI); the Perceived Involvement Personal Questionnaire (PIPQ); and the Quality of Interactions Schedule (QUIS).

RESULTS: Staff who reported higher levels of personal accomplishment (ie lower levels of burnout on the personal accomplishment subscale) exhibited significantly more staff-resident interactions; and staff who perceived more involvement in decisions relating to their work showed significantly fewer negative staff-resident interactions. Staff distress, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were not found to be significantly related to the quantity or quality of staff resident interactions.

CONCLUSIONS: The results provide some support for the hypotheses. It appears that levels of personal accomplishment and perceived involvement in decision-making among staff may significantly influence the quantity and quality of staff-resident interactions in residential settings. However, the causal relationships are uncertain, and replication of these findings is required in other contexts.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app