We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Efficacy of minor analgesics in primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the efficacy and safety of naproxen, ibuprofen, mefenamic acid, aspirin and acetaminophen (paracetamol) in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea through a systemic overview of randomised controlled trials.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index were searched for randomised controlled trials. Efficacy was assessed by measurement of pain relief, requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school. The rate ratios of side effects were used to assess safety.
RESULTS: Fifty-six trials describing 55 comparisons of analgesics with placebo and 12 direct comparisons with other analgesics met our inclusion criteria. Women taking naproxen were over three times more likely to have at least moderate pain relief than those taking placebo. Ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin were also superior to placebo but acetaminophen was not. The requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school were less frequent with naproxen and ibuprofen than placebo but not with aspirin or acetaminophen. Direct comparisons did not show any difference between naproxen and ibuprofen. Side effects occurred more frequently only with naproxen when compared with placebo.
CONCLUSION: Naproxen, ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin are all effective in primary dysmenorrhoea. Ibuprofen appears to have the most favourable risk-benefit ratio. Acetaminophen appears to be less effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but there was only one trial meeting our inclusion criteria and further studies are required.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index were searched for randomised controlled trials. Efficacy was assessed by measurement of pain relief, requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school. The rate ratios of side effects were used to assess safety.
RESULTS: Fifty-six trials describing 55 comparisons of analgesics with placebo and 12 direct comparisons with other analgesics met our inclusion criteria. Women taking naproxen were over three times more likely to have at least moderate pain relief than those taking placebo. Ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin were also superior to placebo but acetaminophen was not. The requirement for rescue analgesics, restriction of daily life and absence from work or school were less frequent with naproxen and ibuprofen than placebo but not with aspirin or acetaminophen. Direct comparisons did not show any difference between naproxen and ibuprofen. Side effects occurred more frequently only with naproxen when compared with placebo.
CONCLUSION: Naproxen, ibuprofen, mefenamic acid and aspirin are all effective in primary dysmenorrhoea. Ibuprofen appears to have the most favourable risk-benefit ratio. Acetaminophen appears to be less effective than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but there was only one trial meeting our inclusion criteria and further studies are required.
Full text links
Trending Papers
2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2023 November 31
How we approach titrating PEEP in patients with acute hypoxemic failure.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 October 32
ANCA-associated vasculitis - Treatment Standard.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2023 November 9
The alternative renin-angiotensin system in critically ill patients: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 November 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app