We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Renal artery evaluation: comparison of spiral CT angiography to intra-arterial DSA.
PURPOSE: To assess the role of spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in renal artery evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively performed both CTA and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) in 50 consecutive patients (24 males and 26 females) who ranged between 9 and 77 years old (mean, 39.3 years), in whom renovascular hypertension was suspected (n = 32) or who were potential renal donors (n = 18). The major scan parameters of CTA were 3-mm collimation, 4-5-mm/sec table speed, and 2-mm reconstruction interval. Both CTA and IA-DSA images were blindly interpreted by two radiologists with respect to the number of accessory renal arteries and the location and severity of renal artery stenosis.
RESULTS: CTA demonstrated 27 of 28 accessory renal arteries (detection rate = 96%). For the detection of stenoses greater than 50% (37 of 127 renal arteries, at 40 sites), the sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 90% and 97%, respectively. For the detection of stenoses greater than 50% in the main renal arteries (32 of 99 main renal arteries, at 32 sites), the sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 100% and 97%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CTA is a reliable and accurate screening modality for the evaluation of renal arteries in patients with suspected renovascular hypertension and in potential renal donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively performed both CTA and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) in 50 consecutive patients (24 males and 26 females) who ranged between 9 and 77 years old (mean, 39.3 years), in whom renovascular hypertension was suspected (n = 32) or who were potential renal donors (n = 18). The major scan parameters of CTA were 3-mm collimation, 4-5-mm/sec table speed, and 2-mm reconstruction interval. Both CTA and IA-DSA images were blindly interpreted by two radiologists with respect to the number of accessory renal arteries and the location and severity of renal artery stenosis.
RESULTS: CTA demonstrated 27 of 28 accessory renal arteries (detection rate = 96%). For the detection of stenoses greater than 50% (37 of 127 renal arteries, at 40 sites), the sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 90% and 97%, respectively. For the detection of stenoses greater than 50% in the main renal arteries (32 of 99 main renal arteries, at 32 sites), the sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 100% and 97%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CTA is a reliable and accurate screening modality for the evaluation of renal arteries in patients with suspected renovascular hypertension and in potential renal donors.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app