We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Detrusor contraction duration as a urodynamic parameter of bladder outlet obstruction for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms.
Journal of Urology 1998 August
PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that detrusor contraction duration increases with bladder outlet obstruction and correlates with the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index. Since the detrusor contraction duration may also depend on detrusor contractility and bladder volume, its use alone in characterizing bladder outlet obstruction is debatable. Therefore, we studied the relationship between detrusor contraction duration and bladder outlet obstruction, bladder capacity, detrusor contractility and symptoms to determine whether detrusor contraction duration is a useful parameter for characterizing bladder outlet obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pressure-flow studies were performed in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Bladder outlet obstruction was defined as passive urethral resistance relation greater than grade II and contractility was determined from Schäfer's nomogram. Detrusor contraction duration was defined as the contraction time elapsed between the first rise in detrusor pressure from baseline to the time at which detrusor pressure returned to baseline at the end of voiding. AUA symptom index was attained from each patient and categorized as mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19) and severe (20 to 35).
RESULTS: Detrusor contraction duration was determined from 58 consecutive pressure-flow studies. This parameter was not significantly different among 23 patients with mild (116.7+/-34.0 seconds), 15 with moderate (102.7+/-61.9 seconds) and 9 with severe (89.2+/-44.4 seconds) AUA symptom index scores. AUA symptom index, as well as irritative and obstructive scores did not significantly correlate with detrusor contraction duration. Detrusor pressure at maximal flow was weakly correlated with detrusor contraction duration (r=0.322, p=0.014). However, detrusor contraction duration in 27 obstructed patients (111.6+/-53.7 seconds) was not significantly different from that of 31 nonobstructed patients (91.5+/-41.5 seconds) and it did not increase with the severity of bladder outlet obstruction. Detrusor contraction duration in 40 patients with good contractility (94.3+/-49.2 seconds) was significantly lower than in 18 patients with poor contractility (115.5+/-43.3 seconds). Detrusor contraction duration was significantly lower in nonobstructed patients with good contractility (72.0+/-21.7 seconds) compared with either nonobstructed patients with poor contractility (118.4+/-47.7 seconds) or obstructed patients with good contractility (112.5+/-58.0 seconds). There was no difference in detrusor contraction duration between nonobstructed patients with poor contractility and obstructed patients with good contractility. Multiple regression analysis showed that detrusor contraction duration can be best predicted by a combination of detrusor pressure at maximal flow, bladder capacity and contractility (r=0.576).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that detrusor contraction duration cannot distinguish patients with from those without bladder outlet obstruction, and it does not correlate with the severity of symptoms. Since our results also showed that detrusor contraction duration depends on several factors related to detrusor and outlet function, it cannot be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pressure-flow studies were performed in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Bladder outlet obstruction was defined as passive urethral resistance relation greater than grade II and contractility was determined from Schäfer's nomogram. Detrusor contraction duration was defined as the contraction time elapsed between the first rise in detrusor pressure from baseline to the time at which detrusor pressure returned to baseline at the end of voiding. AUA symptom index was attained from each patient and categorized as mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19) and severe (20 to 35).
RESULTS: Detrusor contraction duration was determined from 58 consecutive pressure-flow studies. This parameter was not significantly different among 23 patients with mild (116.7+/-34.0 seconds), 15 with moderate (102.7+/-61.9 seconds) and 9 with severe (89.2+/-44.4 seconds) AUA symptom index scores. AUA symptom index, as well as irritative and obstructive scores did not significantly correlate with detrusor contraction duration. Detrusor pressure at maximal flow was weakly correlated with detrusor contraction duration (r=0.322, p=0.014). However, detrusor contraction duration in 27 obstructed patients (111.6+/-53.7 seconds) was not significantly different from that of 31 nonobstructed patients (91.5+/-41.5 seconds) and it did not increase with the severity of bladder outlet obstruction. Detrusor contraction duration in 40 patients with good contractility (94.3+/-49.2 seconds) was significantly lower than in 18 patients with poor contractility (115.5+/-43.3 seconds). Detrusor contraction duration was significantly lower in nonobstructed patients with good contractility (72.0+/-21.7 seconds) compared with either nonobstructed patients with poor contractility (118.4+/-47.7 seconds) or obstructed patients with good contractility (112.5+/-58.0 seconds). There was no difference in detrusor contraction duration between nonobstructed patients with poor contractility and obstructed patients with good contractility. Multiple regression analysis showed that detrusor contraction duration can be best predicted by a combination of detrusor pressure at maximal flow, bladder capacity and contractility (r=0.576).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that detrusor contraction duration cannot distinguish patients with from those without bladder outlet obstruction, and it does not correlate with the severity of symptoms. Since our results also showed that detrusor contraction duration depends on several factors related to detrusor and outlet function, it cannot be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app