We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Periurethral fat injection in the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence.
Journal of Urology 1998 Februrary
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy, safety and mechanism of periurethral fat injection in the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periurethral fat injections were performed in 26 patients for the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence. A complete urogynecological study, including a 1-hour pad test, urodynamic studies and chain urethrocystography were done in each case and were repeated at least 3 months after operation. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months.
RESULTS: Of 26 patients 13 (50%) were dry after operation and 4 (15.4%) showed improvement and were satisfied with the results of the operation, giving a total success rate of 65.4%. There were 6 cases of immediate postoperative minor complications (23%). Average volume of injected fat was 14.8 +/- 4.8 cc, which did not affect the success rate. Preoperative and postoperative chain urethrocystographic values for bladder neck descent in reference to the pubosacral tip line showed no statistical difference between successfully and unsuccessfully treated groups. Urodynamic studies in all cases showed no differences relating to operation. However, minimal urethral resistance increased from 0.122 +/- 0.061 to 0.205 +/- 0.134 (p = 0.023) in the treatment success group. This change was not demonstrated in the treatment failure group.
CONCLUSIONS: Periurethral fat injection for the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence is a simple technique that works by the increment of urethral resistance. It has an acceptable success rate without financial outlay for the injected material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periurethral fat injections were performed in 26 patients for the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence. A complete urogynecological study, including a 1-hour pad test, urodynamic studies and chain urethrocystography were done in each case and were repeated at least 3 months after operation. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months.
RESULTS: Of 26 patients 13 (50%) were dry after operation and 4 (15.4%) showed improvement and were satisfied with the results of the operation, giving a total success rate of 65.4%. There were 6 cases of immediate postoperative minor complications (23%). Average volume of injected fat was 14.8 +/- 4.8 cc, which did not affect the success rate. Preoperative and postoperative chain urethrocystographic values for bladder neck descent in reference to the pubosacral tip line showed no statistical difference between successfully and unsuccessfully treated groups. Urodynamic studies in all cases showed no differences relating to operation. However, minimal urethral resistance increased from 0.122 +/- 0.061 to 0.205 +/- 0.134 (p = 0.023) in the treatment success group. This change was not demonstrated in the treatment failure group.
CONCLUSIONS: Periurethral fat injection for the treatment of recurrent genuine stress incontinence is a simple technique that works by the increment of urethral resistance. It has an acceptable success rate without financial outlay for the injected material.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app